Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563702›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2021

GPs' drug treatment for depression by patients' educational level: registry-based study.

Anneli Borge Hansen, Valborg Baste, Oystein Hetlevik, Inger Haukenes, Tone Smith-Sivertsen, Sabine Ruths

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneli Borge HansenResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway ahan@norceresearch.no.
Valborg BasteResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Oystein HetlevikResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Inger HaukenesResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Tone Smith-SivertsenResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Sabine RuthsResearch Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntidepressant drugs are often prescribed in general practice. Evidence is conflicting on how patient education influences antidepressant treatment.

aimTo investigate the association between educational attainment and drug treatment in adult patients with a new depression diagnosis, and to what extent sex and age influence the association. DESIGN &

settingA nationwide registry-based cohort study was undertaken in Norway from 2014-2016.

methodThe study comprised all residents of Norway born before 1996 and alive in 2015. Information was obtained on all new depression diagnoses in general practice in 2015 (primary care database) and data on all dispensed depression medication (Norwegian Prescription Database [NorPD]) 12 months after the date of diagnosis. Independent variables were education, sex, and age. Associations with drug treatment were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model and performed separately for sex.

resultsOut of 49 967 patients with new depression (61.6% women), 15 678 were dispensed drugs (30.4% women, 33.0% men). Highly educated women were less likely to receive medication (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88 to 0.98) than women with low education. No such differences appeared among men. Women aged 20-29 years were more likely to be treated with drugs than those aged 30-59 years, and women aged ≥70 years were more likely to receive drugs (HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.54 to 1.77) than those aged 20-29 years. The pattern was similar but less pronounced for men.

conclusionEducational differences in antidepressant therapy among women may reflect different treatment approaches that clinicians should be aware of to avoid unintended variation. Reasons for this variation and consequences for quality of treatment should be explored.

Indexed as

antidepressive agentsdepressioneducational statusgeneral practicehealth services researchlarge database research

Identifiers

PMID33563702
PMCPMC8170601
OpenAlexW3127817987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.