ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021
Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Washout Period and Concomitant Medication Work Group.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dietary Supplementation for Fatigue Symptoms in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)-A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Progress and challenges in expanding access to clinical trials in pancreatic cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Factors affecting clinical trial participation in people with interstitial lung disease: a qualitative study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Factors affecting power in stepped wedge trials when the treatment effect varies with time.Trials · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor regarding: 'opioid-free anaesthesia to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting after lower extremity wound surgery: a randomized double-blind crossover trial'.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Modulating Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Solid Tumors in Immunotherapy Trials: A Drug Interaction Analysis from a Phase I Unit.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- 360-degree projection simulation versus traditional simulation in undergraduate paramedicine education: a pilot randomised controlled trial.British paramedic journal · 2025Article
- Optimizing early phase clinical trial washout periods: a report from the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma consortium.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Article
- Target trial framework for determining the effect of changes in training load on injury risk using observational data: a methodological commentary.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Review
- Addressing disparities in cancer clinical trials: a roadmap to more equitable accrual.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- An Analysis of the Biotin-(Strept)avidin System in Immunoassays: Interference and Mitigation Strategies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Temporal Changes in Quality Indicators in a Regional System of Care After Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.CJC open · 2023Article
- Call to action: overcoming enrollment disparities in cancer clinical trials with modernized eligibility criteria.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Enrolling Older Adults Onto National Cancer Institute-Funded Clinical Trials in Community Oncology Clinics: Barriers and Solutions.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWashout periods and concomitant medication exclusions are common in cancer clinical trial protocols. These exclusion criteria are often applied inconsistently and without evidence to justify their use. The authors sought to determine how washout period and concomitant medication allowances can be broadened to speed trial enrollment and improve the generalizability of trial data to a larger oncology practice population without compromising the safety of trial participants. EXPERIMENTAL
designA multistakeholder working group was convened to define problems associated with excessively long washout periods and exclusion of patients due to concomitant medications. The group performed a literature search and evaluated study data from the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), Emory University School of Medicine (Atlanta, GA), and the FDA to understand recent approaches to these eligibility criteria. The group convened to develop consensus recommendations for broadened eligibility criteria.
resultsThe data analysis found that exclusion criteria based on washout periods and concomitant medications are frequently inconsistent and lack scientific rationale. Scientific rationale for appropriate eligibility criteria are presented in the article; for washout periods, rationale is presented by treatment type.
conclusionsArbitrary or blanket washout and concomitant medication exclusions should be eliminated. Where there is evidence to support them, clinically relevant washout periods and concomitant medication-related eligibility criteria may be included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.