ArticleBMJ open2021
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a standardized competency-profile for peer-to-peer-teachers in medical education - a systematic mapping review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- A Multilayered Approach to Professionalism Assessment in Physician Assistant Education: Tracking Growth Beyond Zero-Tolerance Policies.The journal of physician assistant education : the official journal of the Physician Assistant Education Association · 2026Article
- Peer tutoring during clinical internships as experienced by physiotherapy students: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026Review
- A Medical Large Language Model-Based System Improves History-Taking Performance Among Medical Students.Cureus · 2026Article
- Research topic-driven curriculum content reform in graduate immunology to strengthen students' research and innovation competence.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A Formative Assessment System in Baduanjin Physical Education Based on Inertial Measurement Unit Motion Capture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating group dynamics through peer assessment during a global student collaboration of interprofessional healthcare education: A longitudinal study across 33 universities.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
- Clinical education: nursing students' experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service - a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluating the dependability of peer assessment in project-based learning for pre-clinical students: a generalizability theory approach.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Comparison of Medical Students' Peer Evaluation and Teaching Staff Evaluation of Community Health Projects: Perceptions and Experiences.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Enhancing teamwork in higher education: Experiences of podiatry students using SPARKJournal of foot and ankle research · 2024Article
- Investigating the Effectiveness of Formative OSCE Combined with Visual Feedback in Improving Clinical Competence among Iranian Nurse Anesthesia Students: A Quasi-experimental study.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2024Article
- Innovative Tele-Instruction Approach Impacts Basic Life Support Performance: A Non-inferiority Trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFormative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.
designA scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS: Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultThe critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning.
conclusionHealthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students' and teachers' experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.