ArticleUrologic oncology2021
Prognostic markers in pT3 bladder cancer: A study from the international bladder cancer tissue microarray project.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival and clinicopathological significance of B7-H3 in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC urology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of FGFR3, TP53 Mutation and Urinary Biomarkers in Urothelial Carcinoma in Pakistani Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- KDM6A expression loss is frequent in low grade non-invasive urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder.Pathologica · 2025Article
- Tryptophan metabolism enzymes are potential targets in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- PD-1, PD-L1 and cAMP immunohistochemical expressions are associated with worse oncological outcome in patients with bladder cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Bladder cancer journal as official IBCN partner; strengthening global collaboration in bladder cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the prognostic value of 10 putative tumor markers by immunohistochemistry in a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB) with the aim to validate their clinical value and to harmonize protocols for their evaluation. MATERIALS AND
methodsPrimary tumor specimens from 576 patients with pathologic (p)T3 UCB were collected from 24 institutions in North America and Europe. Three replicate 0.6-mm core diameter samples were collected for the construction of a tissue microarray (TMA). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for 10 previously described tumor markers was performed and scored at 3 laboratories independently according to a standardized protocol. Associations between marker positivity and freedom from recurrence (FFR) or overall survival (OS) were analyzed separately for each individual laboratory using Cox regression analysis.
resultsThe overall agreement of the IHC scoring among laboratories was poor. Correlation among the 3 laboratories varied across the 10 markers. There was generally a lack of association between the individual markers and FFR or OS. The number of altered cell cycle regulators (p53, Rb, and p21) was associated with increased risk of cancer recurrence (P < 0.032). There was no clear pattern in the relationship between the percentage of markers altered in an 8-marker panel and FFR or OS.
conclusionsThis large international TMA of locally advanced (pT3) UCB suggests that altered expression of p53, Rb, and p21 is associated with worse outcome. However this study also highlights limitations in the reproducibility of IHC even in the most expert hands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.