Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563487›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2021

Clinical significance of homologous recombination deficiency score testing in endometrial Cancer.

Jean H Siedel, Kari L Ring, Wei Hu, Robert L Dood, Ying Wang, Keith Baggerly, Kathleen M Darcy, Thomas P Conrads, Shannon Gallagher, Placede Tshiaba and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Updates and controversies in the management of uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Targeted and Shallow Whole-Genome Sequencing Identifies Therapeutic Opportunities in p53abn Endometrial Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. PARP inhibitors in non-ovarian gynecologic cancers.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jean H SiedelDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Kari L RingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Wei HuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Robert L DoodDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Ying WangDepartment of Bioinformatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Keith BaggerlyDepartment of Bioinformatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Kathleen M DarcyGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States of America; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Thomas P ConradsGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States of America; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, United States of America.
Shannon GallagherMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake, UT, United States of America.
Placede TshiabaMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake, UT, United States of America.
Chris NeffMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake, UT, United States of America.
Kirsten M TimmsMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake, UT, United States of America.
Selanere MangalaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Shannon N WestinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Russell BroaddusDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America.
Gabriel Lopez-BeresteinCenter for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America.
Karen H LuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Robert L ColemanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
George L MaxwellGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States of America; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, United States of America.
Anil K SoodDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America. Electronic address: asood@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMyriad Genetics · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · USInova Health System · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
U.T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Ovarian CancerP50CA217685 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SOOD, ANIL K · 2017 to 2021
$7.9M
Harnessing the power of exosomes for non-coding RNA deliveryR35CA209904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SOOD, ANIL K · 2017 to 2023
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217685NCI NIH HHS R35 CA209904NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score is related to chemotherapy response in some cancers, but its role in endometrial cancer in not known. We determined frequency and clinical significance of alterations in the HR pathway in endometrial cancer.

methods253 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) samples from two independent cohorts (discovery and replication) were tested for HRD score using the Myriad HRD assay, microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) using a next generation sequencing assay. HRD scores were also generated on endometrial cancer cell lines and in vivo response to olaparib was assessed.

resultsROC curves were employed to determine optimal cutoffs of HRD in relation to survival impact in endometrial cancer and a cutoff of HRD ≥ 4 was suggested for DFS using the discovery cohort. Patients from two independent cohorts with HRD score ≥ 4 trended toward worse survival as compared to those with HRD score < 4. Both cohorts were further separated into four groups according to molecular subtypes (TMB positive; MSI positive; HRD positive; all others). When grouped by molecular subtype, there was a significant difference between groups using an HRD ≥4 cutoff in the initial (p = 0.0024) and replication (p = 0.042) cohorts. The Hec1a model (HRD score = 19) was highly sensitive to olaparib in in vitro and in vivo experiments.

conclusionsHigh HRD score was associated with worse DFS in our patient cohort. These findings suggest that HRD score may have clinical utility in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHomologous RecombinationHumansMiddle AgedBRCA1/2HRDPARP inhibitorsPlatinumUterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID33563487
PMCPMC8538374
OpenAlexW3126399645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.