Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563275›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2021

Biophysical effects, safety and efficacy of raspberry leaf use in pregnancy: a systematic integrative review.

Rebekah Bowman, Jan Taylor, Sally Muggleton, Deborah Davis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polyphenols for the Prevention or Management of Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. The Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effect ofJournal of medicinal food · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebekah BowmanUniversity of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce ACT, 2617, Australia.
Jan TaylorUniversity of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce ACT, 2617, Australia.
Sally MuggletonUniversity of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce ACT, 2617, Australia.
Deborah DavisUniversity of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce ACT, 2617, Australia. Deborah.davis@canberra.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-1064
University of Canberra · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildbearing women have been using various herbs to assist with pregnancy, labour and birth for centuries. One of the most common is raspberry leaf. The evidence base for the use of raspberry leaf is however under-developed. It is incumbent on midwives and other maternity care providers to provide women with evidence-based information so they can make informed choices. The aim of this study was to review the research literature to identify the evidence base on the biophysical effects, safety and efficacy of raspberry leaf in pregnancy.

methodsA systematic, integrative review was undertaken. Six databases were searched to identify empirical research papers published in peer reviewed journals including in vitro, in vivo, human and animal studies. The search included the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection and AMED. Identified studies were appraised independently by two reviewers using the MMAT appraisal instrument. An integrative approach was taken to analysis.

resultsThirteen studies were included. Five were laboratory studies using animal and human tissue, two were experiments using animals, and six were human studies. Included studies were published between 1941 and 2016. Raspberry leaf has been shown to have biophysical effects on animal and human smooth muscle including the uterus. Toxity was demonstrated when high doses were administered intravenously or intaperitoneally in animal studies. Human studies have not shown any harm or benefit though one study demonstrated a clinically meaningful (though non-statistically significant) reduction in length of second stage and augmentation of labour in women taking raspberry leaf.

conclusionsMany women use raspberry leaf in pregnancy to facilitate labour and birth. The evidence base supporting the use of raspeberry leaf in pregnancy is weak and further research is needed to address the question of raspberry leaf's effectiveness.

Indexed as

Plant ExtractsAnimalsFemaleHumansMicePlant LeavesPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRatsRubusUterine ContractionUterusPlant ExtractsComplementary medicine, midwiferyEvidence-based practiceHerbalPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33563275
PMCPMC7871383
OpenAlexW3126852726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.