Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563250›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol.

Monica Eftedal, Torill H Tveito, Ulrik Gensby, M Kamrul Islam, Stein Atle Lie, Gro Aasland, Svein Kostveit, Chris Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Monica EftedalNational Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Haddlandsvegen 20, 3864, Rauland, Norway. monica.eftedal@arbeidoghelse.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-3706
Torill H TveitoNORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Ulrik GensbyNational Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Haddlandsvegen 20, 3864, Rauland, Norway.
M Kamrul IslamDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Stein Atle LieDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Gro AaslandDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Svein KostveitThe Rehabilitation Centre AiR as, Rauland, Norway.
Chris JensenNational Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Haddlandsvegen 20, 3864, Rauland, Norway.
National Oilwell Varco (Norway) · NONORCE Research AS · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOQuality of Life Research Center · DKSykehuset i Vestfold · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NO

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2013126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs is scarce, and even less is known about which programs are best suited for which patients. This study aims to compare the RTW results of two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs in Norway, as well as to examine the delivery and reception of the two programs and explore the active mechanisms of the participants' RTW processes. METHODS/

designWe will use a mixed-method convergent design to study the main outcome. Approximately 600 participants will be included in the study. Eligible study participants will be aged 18-60 years old and have been on sick leave due to MSDs, CMDs, or both for at least 6 weeks. Interdisciplinary teams at both participating clinics will deliver complex occupational rehabilitation programs. The inpatient rehabilitation program has a duration of 4 weeks and is full time. The outpatient program has a duration of 3 months and involves weekly sessions. The primary outcome is RTW. Secondary outcomes are differences in the incremental cost for an averted sick leave day, cost utility/benefit, and differences between the programs regarding improvements in known modifiable obstacles to RTW. Subgroup analyses are planned. The researchers will be blinded to the intervention groups when analyzing the quantitative RTW data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide new insights regarding occupational rehabilitation interventions, treatment targets, and outcomes for different subgroups of sick-listed employees and to inform discussions on the active working mechanisms of occupational rehabilitation and the influence of context in the return-to-work process.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN12033424 , 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSick LeaveAdolescentAdultEmploymentHumansMiddle AgedNorwayReturn to WorkYoung AdultCommon mental disordersMixed methodMusculoskeletal disordersOccupational rehabilitationProcess evaluationReturn to workStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID33563250
PMCPMC7871619
OpenAlexW3129073873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.