Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563131›Full record

SynthesisSports health

Return to Play After Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation in Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment.

Phelopater Sedrak, Mustafa Shahbaz, Chetan Gohal, Kim Madden, Ilyas Aleem, Moin Khan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chiropractic management of L5-S1 disc protrusion in an elite speed skater: a case report.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. [Sport after disc herniation].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Return to sports following discectomy: does a consensus exist?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Looking Back.Sports health
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Phelopater SedrakTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mustafa ShahbazFaculty of Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Chetan GohalDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kim MaddenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ilyas AleemDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Moin KhanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe prevalence of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in athletes can be as high as 75%. For elite athletes diagnosed with LDH, return to play (RTP) is a major concern, and thus comparing surgical with nonoperative care is essential to guide practitioners and athletes, not just in terms of recovery rates but also speed of recovery.

objectiveThe purpose of this systematic review is to provide an update on RTP outcomes for elite athletes after lumbar discectomy versus nonoperative treatment of LDHs. DATA SOURCES: A search of the literature was conducted using 3 online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) to identify pertinent studies. STUDY SELECTION: Yielded studies were screened according to the inclusion criteria. STUDY

designSystematic review with meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed comparing RTP rate for all comparative studies.

resultsTwenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Overall, 663 out of 799 patients (83.0%) returned to play in the surgical group and 251 out of 308 patients (81.5%) returned to play in the nonoperative group. No statistically significant difference for RTP rate was found (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.58-3.34;

conclusionThere was no significant difference in RTP rate between athletes treated with operative or nonoperative management of LDHs, nor did operative management have a faster time to RTP. Athletes should consider the lack of difference in RTP rate in addition to the potential risks associated with spinal surgery when choosing a treatment option. Future randomized controlled trials are needed on this topic to allow for high-powered conclusions.

Indexed as

Return to SportConservative TreatmentDiskectomyHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar Vertebraeathletediscectomynonoperative treatmentreturn to play

Identifiers

PMID33563131
PMCPMC8404721
OpenAlexW3129044067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.