Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563120›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Psychoactive pollution suppresses individual differences in fish behaviour.

Giovanni Polverino, Jake M Martin, Michael G Bertram, Vrishin R Soman, Hung Tan, Jack A Brand, Rachel T Mason, Bob B M Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sensory-Motor Perturbations in Larval Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Frontiers in quantifying wildlife behavioural responses to chemical pollution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giovanni PolverinoCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia (M092), 35 Stirling Highway, 6009 Perth, WA, Australia.
Jake M MartinSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Michael G BertramSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Vrishin R SomanCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia (M092), 35 Stirling Highway, 6009 Perth, WA, Australia.
Hung TanSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Jack A BrandSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Rachel T MasonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Bob B M WongSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental contamination by pharmaceuticals is global, substantially altering crucial behaviours in animals and impacting on their reproduction and survival. A key question is whether the consequences of these pollutants extend beyond mean behavioural changes, restraining differences in behaviour between individuals. In a controlled, two-year, multigenerational experiment with independent mesocosm populations, we exposed guppies (

Indexed as

PoeciliaWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEnvironmental PollutionFluoxetineIndividualityFluoxetineWater Pollutants, Chemicalanimal personalitybehavioural plasticitybehavioural typesecotoxicologyindividualitypharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID33563120
PMCPMC7893217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.