Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563093›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Schoolchildren cooperate more successfully with non-kin than with siblings.

Gladys Barragan-Jason, Maxime Cauchoix, Anne Regnier, Marie Bourjade, Astrid Hopfensitz, Alexis S Chaine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gladys Barragan-JasonStation d'Écologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRS (UMR5321), 09200, Moulis, France.
Maxime CauchoixStation d'Écologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRS (UMR5321), 09200, Moulis, France.
Anne RegnierStation d'Écologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRS (UMR5321), 09200, Moulis, France.
Marie BourjadeCLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Astrid HopfensitzToulouse School of Economics, Universite de Toulouse 1 Capitole, Toulouse, France.
Alexis S ChaineStation d'Écologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRS (UMR5321), 09200, Moulis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperation plays a key role in the development of advanced societies and can be stabilized through shared genes (kinship) or reciprocation. In humans, cooperation among kin occurs more readily than cooperation among non-kin. In many organisms, cooperation can shift with age (e.g. helpers at the nest); however, little is known about developmental shifts between kin and non-kin cooperation in humans. Using a cooperative game, we show that 3- to 10-year-old French schoolchildren cooperated less successfully with siblings than with non-kin children, whether or not non-kin partners were friends. Furthermore, children with larger social networks cooperated better and the perception of friendship among non-friends improved after cooperating. These results contrast with the well-established preference for kin cooperation among adults and indicate that non-kin cooperation in humans might serve to forge and extend non-kin social relationships during middle childhood and create opportunities for future collaboration beyond kin. Our results suggest that the current view of cooperation in humans may only apply to adults and that future studies should focus on how and why cooperation with different classes of partners might change during development in humans across cultures as well as other long-lived organisms.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSiblingsAdultChildChild, PreschoolCooperative BehaviorFriendsHumansSocial Networkingchild developmentevolution of cooperationhuman evolutionkin selectionkinship

Identifiers

PMID33563093
PMCPMC7893240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.