ReviewStroke2021
The Utility of Domain-Specific End Points in Acute Stroke Trials.
Review in Stroke, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of MLC601 in post-stroke functional recovery compared with placebo - the CHIMES & CHIMES-E studies.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Major Adverse Cognitive Events (MACE-Cog): A New "MACE" Framework for Cognitive Outcomes in Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke.Circulation · 2026Review
- Speech and language outcome measures in clinical trials of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Feasibility of telephone and computerized cognitive testing as a secondary outcome in an acute stroke clinical trial: A mixed methods sub-study of the AcT Trial.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Distinct Constructs Underlie Patient-Reported and Performance-Rated Outcomes after Stroke.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Prospective evaluation of the relationship between cognition and recovery outcomes after cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2024Article
- Stroke survivors' preferences on assessing patient-reported outcome measures.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Post-Stroke Brain Health Monitoring and Optimization: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Methodological considerations in PISCES 3: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of intracerebral stem cells in subjects with disability following an ischemic stroke.Frontiers in stroke · 2023Article
- Aerobic physical exercise versus dual-task cognitive walking in cognitive rehabilitation of people with stroke: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Update on an Observational, Clinically Useful Gait Coordination Measure: The Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.).Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Targeting CNS Neural Mechanisms of Gait in Stroke Neurorehabilitation.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Stroke recovery phenotyping through network trajectory approaches and graph neural networks.Brain informatics · 2022Article
- Association of Modified Rankin Scale With Recovery Phenotypes in Patients With Upper Extremity Weakness After Stroke.Neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.