Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562881›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review.

Giulia Fichera, Isolde Martina Busch, Michela Rimondini, Raffaella Motta, Chiara Giraudo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The underestimated role of pioneering women in radiation oncology: lessons from the past for today's practice.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Empowering Patients and Supporting Health Care Providers-New Avenues for High Quality Care and Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia FicheraDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Institute of Radiology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2977-5304
Isolde Martina BuschSection of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-9759
Michela RimondiniSection of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Raffaella MottaDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Institute of Radiology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Chiara GiraudoDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Institute of Radiology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0924-5883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering that radiology is still a male-dominated specialty in which men make up more than two thirds of the workforce, this systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current role of women in radiological imaging, focusing on the main aspects such as career progression, leadership, academic practice, and perceived discrimination. Three electronic databases were searched up to 21 October 2020. To identify additional records, weekly automatic email alerts were set up on PubMed until December 2020 and reference lists of key studies and included papers were screened. Two reviewers independently performed the search, study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, and formal narrative synthesis. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer was involved. Across the 61 included articles, women worked more often part-time and held fewer positions of power in hospitals, on editorial boards, and at the academic level (associate and full professors). Women were less often in relevant positions in scientific articles, had fewer publications, and had a lower H-index. Discrimination and sexual harassment were experienced by up to 40% and 47% of female radiologists, respectively. Our study highlights that women in radiology are still underrepresented and play a marginal role in the field, struggling to reach top and leading positions.

Indexed as

RadiologistsRadiologyFemaleHumansLeadershipMalefemale empowermentgender inequalityradiologywomen

Identifiers

PMID33562881
PMCPMC7915271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.