Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562876›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

AFFIRM Online: Utilising an Affirmative Cognitive-Behavioural Digital Intervention to Improve Mental Health, Access, and Engagement among LGBTQA+ Youth and Young Adults.

Shelley L Craig, Vivian W Y Leung, Rachael Pascoe, Nelson Pang, Gio Iacono, Ashley Austin, Frank Dillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shelley L CraigFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada.
Vivian W Y LeungFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-2076
Rachael PascoeFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada.
Nelson PangFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-8272
Gio IaconoSchool of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5285-7020
Ashley AustinEllen Whiteside-McDonnell School of Social Work, Barry University, Tallahassee, FL 32304, USA.
Frank DillonCollege of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-8362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital mental health interventions may enable access to care for LGBTQA+ youth and young adults that face significant threats to their wellbeing. This study describes the preliminary efficacy of AFFIRM Online, an eight-session manualised affirmative cognitive behavioural group intervention delivered synchronously. Participants (M

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySexual and Gender MinoritiesTransgender PersonsAdolescentAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthYoung Adultcognitive–behaviouraldigital mental healthinterventionLGBTQA+mental healthonline adaptationsexual and gender minoritiestechnology-mediatedyouth

Identifiers

PMID33562876
PMCPMC7915123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.