Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562803›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Evaluation of FET PET Radiomics Feature Repeatability in Glioma Patients.

Robin Gutsche, Jürgen Scheins, Martin Kocher, Khaled Bousabarah, Gereon R Fink, Nadim J Shah, Karl-Josef Langen, Norbert Galldiks, Philipp Lohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The study of dual-phaseScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Prediction of Glioma Grade and IDH Status UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Feasibility of radiomic feature harmonization for pooling of [Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Biology in Treatment Decision Processes-Neuro-Oncology Edition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robin GutscheResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Jürgen ScheinsResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Martin KocherResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-9227
Khaled BousabarahDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Gereon R FinkResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8230-1856
Nadim J ShahResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8151-6169
Karl-Josef LangenResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Philipp LohmannResearch Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5360-046X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 428090865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amino acid PET using the tracer O-(2-[

Indexed as

amino acid PETartificial intelligencemachine learningtextural features

Identifiers

PMID33562803
PMCPMC7915742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.