Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562795›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Early Child Development Assessments and Their Associations with Long-Term Academic and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Leah N Isquith-Dicker, Andrew Kwist, Danae Black, Stephen E Hawes, Jennifer Slyker, Sharon Bergquist, Susanne P Martin-Herz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leah N Isquith-DickerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington START Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Andrew KwistDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington START Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Danae BlackDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington START Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Stephen E HawesDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington START Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Jennifer SlykerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington START Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Sharon BergquistBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 500 5th Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Susanne P Martin-HerzDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, 1825 Fourth St., 6th Floor, UCSF Box 4054, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental screening instruments were designed as diagnostic tools, but there is growing interest in understanding whether select tools can also be used systematically in research to examine intervention impacts on long-term outcomes. As such, this systematic review aims to examine associations between child development assessment tools and educational attainment, academic achievement, or wealth. We included studies identified in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Educational Resources Information Center if they reported an association between at least one tool from a pre-established list and one outcome of interest after age 10. Of 597 studies identified, 11 met inclusion criteria; three examined educational attainment as the outcome of interest, six examined academic achievement, one wealth, and one both educational attainment and wealth. Intelligence tests were utilized in five of the included studies, neuropsychological/executive function or behavior tools were used in five, and one study used tools across the domains. High-quality studies were identified across all three of the domains, but educational attainment and wealth had the greatest proportion of high-quality studies, as compared to academic achievement. Our review demonstrates the potential for certain child development assessment tools to adequately assess long-term outcomes of interest, but additional prospective studies using validated, culturally appropriate tools are needed. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018092292.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessChild DevelopmentChildEducational StatusHumansProspective Studiesacademic achievementchild developmentchild development assessmenteducationeducational attainmentfunctioningmeasurementoutcomeswealth/socioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID33562795
PMCPMC7915620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.