Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562750›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in Early Life on Children's Growth and Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Kristine Ma, Shu Qin Wei, Wei Guang Bi, Hope A Weiler, Shi Wu Wen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Short-term and long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristine MaCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.
Shu Qin WeiCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5334-7652
Wei Guang BiCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.
Hope A WeilerSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC H9X 3L9, Canada.
Shi Wu WenOMNI Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D deficiency during pregnancy or infancy is associated with adverse growth in children. No systematic review has been conducted to summarize available evidence on the effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and infancy on growth and body composition in children.

objectiveWe aim to summarize the available evidence on the effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and infancy on child growth and body composition.

methodA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on the effects of vitamin D supplementation during early life on children's growth and body composition (bone, lean and fat). A literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to identify relevant studies on the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and infancy on children's body composition (bone, lean and fat) in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from inception to 31 December 2020. A Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool was used for quality assessment. The comparison was vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo or standard care. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted. The effects are presented as mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsA total of 3960 participants from eleven randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was associated with higher triceps skinfold thickness (mm) (MD 0.33, 95% CI, 0.12, 0.54; I

conclusionVitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or infancy may be associated with reduced adiposity in childhood. Further large clinical trials of the effects of vitamin D supplementation on childhood body composition are warranted.

Indexed as

AdiposityBiasBody CompositionBody HeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightBone DensityConfidence IntervalsFemaleGrowthHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOdds RatioPlacebosPregnancyPlacebosVitamin DVitaminsadipositybody compositionchildhoodinfancypregnancyrandomized controlled trialsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID33562750
PMCPMC7914476
OpenAlexW3126807071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.