Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562749›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies.

David Neal, Floor van den Berg, Caroline Planting, Teake Ettema, Karin Dijkstra, Evelyn Finnema, Rose-Marie Dröes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Serious Games for Seniors With Dementia: A Pilot Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Introducing and Familiarising Older Adults Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers to Virtual Reality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. A multi-criteria decision model for assessing health and self-care ability.Central European journal of operations research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David NealDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-3299
Floor van den BergDepartment of Linguistics and English as a Second Language, University of Groningen, 9712 EK Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-1293
Caroline PlantingDepartment of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, 1070 BB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6022-153X
Teake EttemaDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9874-6075
Karin DijkstraResearch Group Nursing, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, 7417 DH Deventer, The Netherlands.
Evelyn FinnemaHealth Sciences-Nursing Research, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rose-Marie DröesDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGZ inGeest · NLSaxion · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

EU Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action Innovative Training Network, DISTINCT 813196Foundation for Support VCVGZ N.A.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of technology to support social health in dementia. The primary objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of effectiveness of digital technologies used by people with dementia to improve self-management and social participation. Records published from 1 January 2007 to 9 April 2020 were identified from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Controlled interventional studies evaluating interventions based on any digital technology were included if: primary users of the technology had dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI); and the study reported outcomes relevant to self-management or social participation. Studies were clustered by population, intervention, and outcomes, and narrative synthesis was undertaken. Of 1394 records identified, nine met the inclusion criteria: two were deemed to be of poor methodological quality, six of fair quality, and one of good quality. Three clusters of technologies were identified: virtual reality, wearables, and software applications. We identified weak evidence that digital technologies may provide less benefit to people with dementia than people with MCI. Future research should address the methodological limitations and narrow scope of existing work. In the absence of strong evidence, clinicians and caregivers must use their judgement to appraise available technologies on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

caregiver supportdementiadigital technologymild cognitive impairmentself-managementsocial healthsocial participation

Identifiers

PMID33562749
PMCPMC7915697
OpenAlexW3126698520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.