ArticleBrain sciences2021
A Densely Connected Multi-Branch 3D Convolutional Neural Network for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Improved SSVEP Classification Through EEG Artifact Reduction Using Auxiliary Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temporal convolutional transformer for EEG based motor imagery decoding.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Effect of Processing Techniques on the Classification Accuracy of Brain-Computer Interface Systems.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Compact convolutional transformer for subject-independent motor imagery EEG-based BCIs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Bidirectional feature pyramid attention-based temporal convolutional network model for motor imagery electroencephalogram classification.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
- EEG-FMCNN: A fusion multi-branch 1D convolutional neural network for EEG-based motor imagery classification.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Convolutional Neural Network with a Topographic Representation Module for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Input Shape Effect on Classification Performance of Raw EEG Motor Imagery Signals with Convolutional Neural Networks for Use in Brain-Computer Interfaces.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- A Parallel Feature Fusion Network Combining GRU and CNN for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) is a classical method of brain-computer interaction (BCI), in which electroencephalogram (EEG) signal features evoked by imaginary body movements are recognized, and relevant information is extracted. Recently, various deep-learning methods are being focused on in finding an easy-to-use EEG representation method that can preserve both temporal information and spatial information. To further utilize the spatial and temporal features of EEG signals, an improved 3D representation of the EEG and a densely connected multi-branch 3D convolutional neural network (dense M3D CNN) for MI classification are introduced in this paper. Specifically, as compared to the original 3D representation, a new padding method is proposed to pad the points without electrodes with the mean of all the EEG signals. Based on this new 3D presentation, a densely connected multi-branch 3D CNN with a novel dense connectivity is proposed for extracting the EEG signal features. Experiments were carried out on the WAY-EEG-GAL and BCI competition IV 2a datasets to verify the performance of this proposed method. The experimental results show that the proposed framework achieves a state-of-the-art performance that significantly outperforms the multi-branch 3D CNN framework, with a 6.208% improvement in the average accuracy for the BCI competition IV 2a datasets and 6.281% improvement in the average accuracy for the WAY-EEG-GAL datasets, with a smaller standard deviation. The results also prove the effectiveness and robustness of the method, along with validating its use in MI-classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.