Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562456›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Pain Standards for Accredited Healthcare Organizations (ACDON Project): A Mixed Methods Study.

Concepción Pérez, Jimmy Martin-Delgado, Mercedes Vinuesa, Pedro J Ibor, Mercedes Guilabert, José Gomez, Carmen Beato, Juana Sánchez-Jiménez, Ignacio Velázquez, Claudio Calvo-Espinos and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Concepción PérezPain Unit, Quality Department, La Princesa University Hospital, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-8936
Jimmy Martin-DelgadoAtenea Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research, 03550 Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4384-9197
Mercedes VinuesaPain Unit, Quality Department, La Princesa University Hospital, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1786-270X
Pedro J IborPain Research Group, Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians, 28009 Valencia, Spain.
Mercedes GuilabertHealth Psychology Department, Miguel Hernandez University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0706-9911
José GomezOncology Department, La Fe Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Carmen BeatoOncology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.
Juana Sánchez-JiménezFamily Medicine Department, Daroca Health Center, 28017 Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio VelázquezPain Unit, Guadix High Resolution Hospital, 18500 Guadix, Spain.
Claudio Calvo-EspinosPalliative Care Department, Rioja Salud Foundation, 26006 La Rioja, Spain.
María L CánovasAnesthesiology Department, Ourense Hospital Complex, 32005 Ourense, Spain.
José A YáñezNursery Department, Carlos Haya Hospital, 29010 Malaga, Spain.
Mireia RodríguezNursery Department, Terrassa Health Consortium, 08227 Terrasa, Spain.
José L BaqueroScientific Coordination, Spanish Forum of Patients, 28018 Madrid, Spain.
Elisa GallachPsychology Department, La Fe Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Emma FolchNursery Department, Francolí Sociosanitary Hospital, 43005 Tarragona, Spain.
Albert TucaOncology Department, Barcelona Clinic Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4633-5856
Manel SantiñaSpanish Society for Quality of Care, 33003 Oviedo, Spain.
José J MiraAtenea Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research, 03550 Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-083X

Funding

Grupo Ferrer Internacional, S.A N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 50% of cancer patients and up to 90% of those in terminal stages experience pain associated with disease progression, poor quality of life, and social impact on caregivers. This study aimed to establish standards for the accreditation of oncological pain management in healthcare organizations. A mixed methods approach was used. First, a pragmatic literature review was conducted. Second, consensus between professionals and patients was reached using the Nominal Group and Delphi technique in a step that involved anesthesiologists, oncologists, family physicians, nurses, psychologists, patient representatives, and caregivers. Third, eight hospitals participated in a pilot assessment of the level of fulfillment of each standard. A total of 37 standards were extracted. The Nominal Group produced additional standards, of which 60 were included in Questionnaire 0 that was used in the Delphi Technique. Two Delphi voting rounds were performed to reach a high level of consensus, and involved 64 and 62 participants with response rates of 90% and 87%, respectively. Finally, 39 standards for the management of cancer pain were agreed upon. In the self-evaluation, the average range of compliance was between 56.4% and 100%. The consensus standards of the ACDON Project might improve the monitoring of cancer pain management. These standards satisfied the demands of professionals and patients and could be used for the accreditation of approaches in cancer pain management.

Indexed as

accreditationcancerpainpatient-centered carepatient-safetyquality of care

Identifiers

PMID33562456
PMCPMC7914789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.