Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562360›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Characterization of Efficacy and Animal Safety across Four Caprine Disbudding Methodologies.

Kelly M Still Brooks, Melissa N Hempstead, Jessica L Anderson, Rebecca L Parsons, Mhairi A Sutherland, Paul J Plummer, Suzanne T Millman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pain Assessment in Goat Kids: Focus on Disbudding.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly M Still BrooksDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Melissa N HempsteadDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-0318
Jessica L AndersonDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9566-6985
Rebecca L ParsonsDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Mhairi A SutherlandAgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
Paul J PlummerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Suzanne T MillmanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-4647
Iowa State University · USAgResearch · NZ

Funding

American Dairy Goat Association N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a strong industry demand for technically simple and highly efficacious alternatives to heat cautery disbudding in goat kids that can be performed as a stand-alone procedure without adjunct anesthesia, and that result in improved overall welfare through reduced acute pain, reduced tissues healing interval, and a consistent safety record. The objective of this study was to consider the net effect of disbudding techniques on goat welfare by examining vocalization frequency, long-term efficacy and animal safety associated with four alternative caprine disbudding methods against sham-disbudded and heat-cautery controls. Sixty-five commercial male dairy kids were disbudded at 3-10 days of age with one of six disbudding treatments (clove oil injection, caustic paste, two cryosurgical methods, heat-cautery, and sham procedure). Heat cautery was 91% effective, caustic paste was 55% effective, and the other treatments were ineffective. Heat cautery and sham procedures resulted in similar vocalization efforts; freezing with a liquid-nitrogen cooled iron resulted in significantly greater vocalization numbers. No unintended paste transfer injuries were observed with short-term application of the caustic paste. Heat cautery resulted in numerous superficial infections but no permanent injury. Clove oil injection was associated with several unexpected and severe complications including unintended tissue necrosis, temporary paresis, skull defects, meningitis, and death. Collectively, we did not find that any of the alternative methods of disbudding provided a feasible option over heat cautery to improve welfare.

Indexed as

caustic pasteclove oilcryosurgicaldisbuddinggoatheat cautery

Identifiers

PMID33562360
PMCPMC7915256
OpenAlexW3129115277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.