Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562347›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Advances in de Novo Drug Design: From Conventional to Machine Learning Methods.

Varnavas D Mouchlis, Antreas Afantitis, Angela Serra, Michele Fratello, Anastasios G Papadiamantis, Vassilis Aidinis, Iseult Lynch, Dario Greco, Georgia Melagraki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Varnavas D MouchlisDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1046, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-1867
Antreas AfantitisDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1046, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-0977-8180
Angela SerraFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-1492
Michele FratelloFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3997-2339
Anastasios G PapadiamantisDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1046, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1297-3104
Vassilis AidinisInstitute for Bioinnovation, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Fleming 34, 16672 Athens, Greece.
Iseult LynchSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-4584
Dario GrecoFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-9003
Georgia MelagrakiDivision of Physical Sciences & Applications, Hellenic Military Academy, 16672 Vari, Greece.

Funding

Academy of Finland grant agreement 322761H2020 EU NanoCommons (Grant Agreement No. 731032), the EU H2020 nanoinformatics project NanoSolveIT (Grant Agreement No. 814572)Research and Innovation Foundation CONCEPT/0618/0031, ENTERPRISES/0916/14 and ENTERPRISES/0618/0122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

. De novo drug design is a computational approach that generates novel molecular structures from atomic building blocks with no a priori relationships. Conventional methods include structure-based and ligand-based design, which depend on the properties of the active site of a biological target or its known active binders, respectively. Artificial intelligence, including machine learning, is an emerging field that has positively impacted the drug discovery process. Deep reinforcement learning is a subdivision of machine learning that combines artificial neural networks with reinforcement-learning architectures. This method has successfully been employed to develop novel de novo drug design approaches using a variety of artificial networks including recurrent neural networks, convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, and autoencoders. This review article summarizes advances in de novo drug design, from conventional growth algorithms to advanced machine-learning methodologies and highlights hot topics for further development.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsArtificial intelligenceartificial neural networksautoencodersconvolutional neural networksdeep reinforcement learningde novo drug designgenerative adversarial networksmachine learningrecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID33562347
PMCPMC7915729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.