Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562313›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Chinese Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Acceptance toward Artificial Meat.

Jingjing Liu, Élise Hocquette, Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury, Sghaier Chriki, Jean-François Hocquette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingjing LiuINRAE, Clermont-Ferrand, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, 63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France.
Élise HocquetteUniversité Catholique de Lyon, 69002 Lyon, France.
Marie-Pierre Ellies-OuryINRAE, Clermont-Ferrand, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, 63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France.
Sghaier ChrikiAgroecology and Environment Unit, ISARA Agro School for Life, 23 rue Jean Baldassini, CEDEX 07, 69364 Lyon, France.
Jean-François HocquetteINRAE, Clermont-Ferrand, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, 63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2409-3881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interest for artificial meat has recently expanded. However, from the literature, perception of artificial meat in China is not well known. A survey was thus carried out to investigate Chinese attitudes toward artificial meat. The answers of 4666 respondents concluded that 19.9% and 9.6% of them were definitely willing and unwilling to try artificial meat respectively, whereas 47.2% were not willing to eat it regularly, and 87.2% were willing to pay less for it compared to conventional meat. Finally, 52.9% of them will accept artificial meat as an alternative to conventional meat. Emotional resistance such as the perception of "absurdity or disgusting" would lead to no willingness to eat artificial meat regularly. The main concerns were related to safety and unnaturalness, but less to ethical and environmental issues as in Western countries. Nearly half of the respondents would like artificial meat to be safe, tasty, and nutritional. Whereas these expectations have low effects on willingness to try, they may induce consumers' rejection to eat artificial meat regularly, underlying the weak relationship between wishes to try and to eat regularly. Thus, potential acceptance of artificial meat in China depends on Chinese catering culture, perception of food and traditional philosophy.

Indexed as

artificial meatChinese consumersurveywillingness to eatwillingness to paywillingness to try

Identifiers

PMID33562313
PMCPMC7915407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.