Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33562166›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Pressure Sensor System for Customized Scoliosis Braces.

Franz Konstantin Fuss, Asliza Ahmad, Adin Ming Tan, Rizal Razman, Yehuda Weizman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Improving Home-Based Scoliosis Therapy: Findings From a Web-Based Survey.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Franz Konstantin FussSmart Products Engineering Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9846-0985
Asliza AhmadCentre for Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-2887
Adin Ming TanSmart Products Engineering Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Rizal RazmanCentre for Sport & Exercise Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4647-4573
Yehuda WeizmanSmart Products Engineering Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Swinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hard-shell thoracolumbar sacral orthoses (TLSOs) are used for treating idiopathic scoliosis, a deformation of the spine with a sideways curvature. The pressure required inside the TLSO for ideal corrective results remains unclear. Retrofitting TLSOs with commercially available pressure measurement systems is expensive and can only be performed in a laboratory. The aim of this study was to develop a cost-effective but accurate pressure sensor system for TLSOs. The sensor was built from a piezoresistive polymer, placed between two closed-cell foam liners, and evaluated with a material testing machine. Because foams are energy absorbers, the pressure-conductance curve was affected by hysteresis. The sensor was calibrated on a force plate with the transitions from loading to unloading used to establish the calibration curve. The root mean square error was 12% on average within the required pressure range of 0.01-0.13 MPa. The sensor reacted to the changing pressure during breathing and different activities when tested underneath a chest belt at different tensions. The peak pressure reached 0.135 MPa. The sensor was further tested inside the scoliosis brace during different activities. The measured pressure was 0.014-0.124 MPa. The results from this study enable cheaper and mobile systems to be used for clinical studies on the comfort and pressure of braces during daily activities.

Indexed as

BracesScoliosisEquipment DesignHumansOrthotic DevicesSpinecalibrationcost-effective developmentfoam propertieshysteresispressure sensorscoliosis brace

Identifiers

PMID33562166
PMCPMC7915694
OpenAlexW3128010997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.