ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2021
Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Stage in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Accuracy and Generalizability across Populations and Cameras.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunities and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Automated Assessment of OCT Angiography Image Quality Using the Artificial Intelligence Ready and Exploratory Atlas for Diabetes Insights Data Set.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Comparing the Generalizability of Multiregional versus Locally Trained Deep Learning Models for Trachoma Detection.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- VEA-net: vascular enhancement attention with dual-backbone multi-task learning for comprehensive ROP management across multi-center datasets.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Why aren't we using AI in eye clinics? A systematic review of barriers and solutions in AI-based fundus image diagnostics for ocular diseases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Review of Retinopathy of Prematurity Management in the Anti-VEGF Era: Evolving Global Paradigms, Persistent Challenges and Our AI-Assisted Future.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Advancing Precision, Accuracy, and Early Detection in Cancer Diagnosis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based prediction of cardiopulmonary disease in retinal images of premature infants.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity development and treatment need with machine learning models.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A Future Picture: A Review of Current Generative Adversarial Neural Networks in Vitreoretinal Pathologies and Their Future Potentials.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Deep learning applications for diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity diseases diagnosis: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Unmasking biases and navigating pitfalls in the ophthalmic artificial intelligence lifecycle: A narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2024Review
- Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Retinopathy of Prematurity Care: Challenges and Opportunities.International ophthalmology clinics · 2024Review
- Assessing spectral effectiveness in color fundus photography for deep learning classification of retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Early Diagnosis of Retinal Diseases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Development of a deep learning model to distinguish the cause of optic disc atrophy using retinal fundus photography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Learning across diverse biomedical data modalities and cohorts: Challenges and opportunities for innovation.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based image analysis in clinical testing: lessons from cervical cancer screening.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Teleophthalmology and retina: a review of current tools, pathways and services.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStage is an important feature to identify in retinal images of infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The purpose of this study was to implement a convolutional neural network (CNN) for binary detection of stages 1, 2, and 3 in ROP and to evaluate its generalizability across different populations and camera systems.
designDiagnostic validation study of CNN for stage detection.
participantsRetinal fundus images obtained from preterm infants during routine ROP screenings.
methodsTwo datasets were used: 5943 fundus images obtained by RetCam camera (Natus Medical, Pleasanton, CA) from 9 North American institutions and 5049 images obtained by 3nethra camera (Forus Health Incorporated, Bengaluru, India) from 4 hospitals in Nepal. Images were labeled based on the presence of stage by 1 to 3 expert graders. Three CNN models were trained using 5-fold cross-validation on datasets from North America alone, Nepal alone, and a combined dataset and were evaluated on 2 held-out test sets consisting of 708 and 247 images from the Nepali and North American datasets, respectively.
main outcome measuresConvolutional neural network performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsBoth the North American- and Nepali-trained models demonstrated high performance on a test set from the same population: AUROC, 0.99; AUPRC, 0.98; sensitivity, 94%; and AUROC, 0.97; AUPRC, 0.91; and sensitivity, 73%; respectively. However, the performance of each model decreased to AUROC of 0.96 and AUPRC of 0.88 (sensitivity, 52%) and AUROC of 0.62 and AUPRC of 0.36 (sensitivity, 44%) when evaluated on a test set from the other population. Compared with the models trained on individual datasets, the model trained on a combined dataset achieved improved performance on each respective test set: sensitivity improved from 94% to 98% on the North American test set and from 73% to 82% on the Nepali test set.
conclusionsA CNN can identify accurately the presence of ROP stage in retinal images, but performance depends on the similarity between training and testing populations. We demonstrated that internal and external performance can be improved by increasing the heterogeneity of the training dataset features of the training dataset, in this case by combining images from different populations and cameras.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.