Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561545›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2021

Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Stage in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Accuracy and Generalizability across Populations and Cameras.

Jimmy S Chen, Aaron S Coyner, Susan Ostmo, Kemal Sonmez, Sanyam Bajimaya, Eli Pradhan, Nita Valikodath, Emily D Cole, Tala Al-Khaled, R V Paul Chan and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jimmy S ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Aaron S CoynerDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Susan OstmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Kemal SonmezCancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sanyam BajimayaTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Eli PradhanTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nita ValikodathDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Emily D ColeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tala Al-KhaledDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
R V Paul ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Praveer SinghAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Peter CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: campbelp@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology · NP

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI John Peter Campbell · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
Artificial Intelligence Assisted Panoramic Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Retinopathy of PrematurityR01HD107494 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI John Peter Campbell, Yifan Jian · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
Mentored Vision Clinician-Scientist Program at OHSUK12EY027720 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
Clinical and genetic analysis of retinopathy of prematurityR01HD107493 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2021 to 2023
$1.8M
Robust AI to develop risk models in retinopathy of prematurity using deep learningR21EY031883 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2020 to 2021
$472k
Artificial intelligence assisted panoramic Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY031331 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER, JIAN, YIFAN · 2020 to 2020
$342k
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY027720NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031331NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031883NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107493NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107494NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStage is an important feature to identify in retinal images of infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The purpose of this study was to implement a convolutional neural network (CNN) for binary detection of stages 1, 2, and 3 in ROP and to evaluate its generalizability across different populations and camera systems.

designDiagnostic validation study of CNN for stage detection.

participantsRetinal fundus images obtained from preterm infants during routine ROP screenings.

methodsTwo datasets were used: 5943 fundus images obtained by RetCam camera (Natus Medical, Pleasanton, CA) from 9 North American institutions and 5049 images obtained by 3nethra camera (Forus Health Incorporated, Bengaluru, India) from 4 hospitals in Nepal. Images were labeled based on the presence of stage by 1 to 3 expert graders. Three CNN models were trained using 5-fold cross-validation on datasets from North America alone, Nepal alone, and a combined dataset and were evaluated on 2 held-out test sets consisting of 708 and 247 images from the Nepali and North American datasets, respectively.

main outcome measuresConvolutional neural network performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsBoth the North American- and Nepali-trained models demonstrated high performance on a test set from the same population: AUROC, 0.99; AUPRC, 0.98; sensitivity, 94%; and AUROC, 0.97; AUPRC, 0.91; and sensitivity, 73%; respectively. However, the performance of each model decreased to AUROC of 0.96 and AUPRC of 0.88 (sensitivity, 52%) and AUROC of 0.62 and AUPRC of 0.36 (sensitivity, 44%) when evaluated on a test set from the other population. Compared with the models trained on individual datasets, the model trained on a combined dataset achieved improved performance on each respective test set: sensitivity improved from 94% to 98% on the North American test set and from 73% to 82% on the Nepali test set.

conclusionsA CNN can identify accurately the presence of ROP stage in retinal images, but performance depends on the similarity between training and testing populations. We demonstrated that internal and external performance can be improved by increasing the heterogeneity of the training dataset features of the training dataset, in this case by combining images from different populations and cameras.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArea Under CurveBirth WeightDatasets as TopicFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNepalNorth AmericaPhotographyReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceGeneralizabilityNeural networksRetinopathy of prematurityStage

Identifiers

PMID33561545
PMCPMC8364291
OpenAlexW3126952145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.