Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561505›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer2021

Artificial intelligence and digital pathology: Opportunities and implications for immuno-oncology.

Faranak Sobhani, Ruth Robinson, Azam Hamidinekoo, Ioannis Roxanis, Navita Somaiah, Yinyin Yuan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Artificial intelligence in arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faranak SobhaniDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: faranak.sobhani@icr.ac.uk.
Ruth RobinsonDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: ruthrobinson2@nhs.net.
Azam HamidinekooDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: azam.nekoo@icr.ac.uk.
Ioannis RoxanisThe Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: ioannis.roxanis@icr.ac.uk.
Navita SomaiahDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: navita.somaiah@icr.ac.uk.
Yinyin YuanDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: yinyin.yuan@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

The Role of the Microbiome in Cancer Suppression and Susceptibility Across SpeciesU54CA217376 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MALEY, CARLO, SHIBATA, DARRYL K · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
(PQC3) Genomic Diversity and Microenvironment as Drivers of Metastasis in DCISR01CA185138 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HWANG, E.SHELLEY, MALEY, CARLO · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
Cancer Research UK C25858/A28592Cancer Research UK C45982/A21808Cancer Research UK C56167/A29363Cancer Research UK C9203/A28770NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185138NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of immuno-oncology has expanded rapidly over the past decade, but key questions remain. How does tumour-immune interaction regulate disease progression? How can we prospectively identify patients who will benefit from immunotherapy? Identifying measurable features of the tumour immune-microenvironment which have prognostic or predictive value will be key to making meaningful gains in these areas. Recent developments in deep learning enable big-data analysis of pathological samples. Digital approaches allow data to be acquired, integrated and analysed far beyond what is possible with conventional techniques, and to do so efficiently and at scale. This has the potential to reshape what can be achieved in terms of volume, precision and reliability of output, enabling data for large cohorts to be summarised and compared. This review examines applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to important questions in immuno-oncology (IO). We discuss general considerations that need to be taken into account before AI can be applied in any clinical setting. We describe AI methods that have been applied to the field of IO to date and present several examples of their use.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBig DataBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisTumor EscapeTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorArtificial intelligence (AI)Deep learning (DL)Digital pathology (DP)Immuno-oncology (IO)

Identifiers

PMID33561505
PMCPMC9062980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.