Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561369›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

Novel Adjective Processing in Preschool Children: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Katelyn L Gerwin, Laurence B Leonard, Jennifer Schumaker, Patricia Deevy, Eileen Haebig, Christine Weber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn L GerwinDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Laurence B LeonardDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jennifer SchumakerDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Patricia DeevyDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Eileen HaebigDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Christine WeberDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USLouisiana State University · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Specific Language ImpairmentR01DC014708 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey Karpicke · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014708NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Recent findings in preschool children indicated novel adjective recall was enhanced when learned using repeated retrieval with contextual reinstatement (RRCR) compared to repeated study (RS). Recall was similar for learned pictures used during training and new (generalized) pictures with the same adjective features. The current study compared the effects of learning method and learned/generalized pictures on the neural processes mediating the recognition of novel adjectives. Method Twenty typically developing children aged 4;6-5;11 (years;months) learned four novel adjectives, two using RRCR and two using RS. Five-minute and 1-week tests assessed adjective recall using learned and generalized pictures. Also, at the 1-week visit, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to assess children's processing of learned/generalized pictures, followed by naturally spoken novel adjectives in a match-mismatch paradigm. Results Naming recall and match-mismatch judgment accuracy were similar for the RS and RRCR conditions and across learned/generalized pictures. However, ERPs revealed more reliable condition effects in the phonological mapping negativity, indexing phonological expectations, and the late positive component, indexing semantic reanalysis, for the adjectives learned in the RRCR relative to the RS condition. Unfamiliar pictures (generalized) elicited larger amplitude N300 and N400 components relative to learned pictures. Conclusions Although behavioral accuracy measures suggest similar effects of the RS and RRCR learning conditions, subtle differences in the ERPs underlying novel adjective processing indicate advantages of RRCR for phonological processing and semantic reanalysis. While children readily generalized the novel adjectives, ERPs revealed greater cognitive resources for processing unfamiliar compared to learned pictures of the novel adjective characteristics. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13683214.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsBrainChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguageMaleSemantics

Identifiers

PMID33561369
PMCPMC8632481
OpenAlexW3127007225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.