Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561180›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Willingness to work during initial lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic: Study based on an online survey among physicians of Bangladesh.

Md Abdur Rafi, M Tasdik Hasan, Dewan Tasnia Azad, Syeda Fatema Alam, Vivek Podder, Sahadat Hossain, S M Quamrul Akther, Fatema Ashraf, Md Golam Hossain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Abdur RafiRajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-6399
M Tasdik HasanDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Dewan Tasnia AzadJashore Medical College, Jashore, Bangladesh.
Syeda Fatema AlamShaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Vivek PodderTairunnessa Memorial Medical College and Hospital, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3103-3043
Sahadat HossainPublic Health Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
S M Quamrul AktherShaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fatema AshrafPublic Health Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Golam HossainDepartment of Statistics, Health Research Group, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-5489
Child Health Research Foundation · BDShaheed Suhrawardy Medical College · BDRajshahi Medical College · BDUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Rajshahi · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the catastrophic situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, the role of the health care workers (HCWs) is the most crucial, and their absenteeism, whether due to inability or unwillingness, becomes a major concern for the national health system. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the willingness and its associated factors to work during the COVID-19 pandemic among the physicians of Bangladesh.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted from April 21 to May 10, 2020, using an online survey among the Bangladeshi physicians living in the country. Both univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of the willingness of the physicians to work during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsMore than 69% physicians reported that they were willing to work during the COVID-19 pandemic, 8.9% reported that they were not willing, while 21.4% of participants were not sure about their willingness. Younger age, having experience of treating patients during previous pandemics, working in the emergency departments and high self-reported compliance to the recommended PPE were important predictors of being willing to work during COVID-19 pandemic. Concern for family and risk of transmitting the infection to family members were most commonly reported as major barriers of working during the pandemic (30%) followed by having comorbidities (25%), lack of adequate safety measures (25%), fear of being infected (12.2%), not involved in clinical practice (12.5%) etc.

conclusionsThough the majority of the physicians were willing to work during the COVID-19 pandemic, sufficient supply of PPE, support to maintain recommended quarantine and isolation policy after risky hospital duty along with adequate and effective training can increase their willingness to continue their sacred duty during this crucial pandemic.

Indexed as

PandemicsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBangladeshCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal Protective EquipmentPhysiciansRiskSurveys and QuestionnairesWork

Identifiers

PMID33561180
PMCPMC7874948
OpenAlexW3127723980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.