Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561135›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Ambulatory anal self-sampling in MSM living with HIV, an acceptable and reliable screening method.

Benoît Heid-Picard, Béatrix Cochand-Priollet, Flore Rozenberg, David Giang-Phang, Jean-Paul Viard, Valentina La Torre, Jade Ghosn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benoît Heid-PicardDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Béatrix Cochand-PriolletDepartment of Pathology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Flore RozenbergDepartment of Virology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
David Giang-PhangDepartement of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean-Paul ViardDepartement of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Valentina La TorreDiagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jade GhosnDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2914-959X
Université Paris Cité · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAnal cancer, usually driven by an oncogenic Human Papillomavirus, remains a leading cause of morbidity in men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV, despite combined antiretroviral therapy. Various recommendations advocate to perform regular examination and proctologist-performed samples to anticipate this risk and treat locally before cancer occurrence, an efficient strategy which has the drawback of requiring the proctologist's availability. This study evaluates the acceptability, feasibility, and efficiency of self-performed samples to screen for HPV-infection and HPV-related anal dysplasia among MSM living with HIV followed in Hôtel-Dieu Hospital.

methodsBetween February 2015 and June 2015, MSM living with HIV and referred to the day-care hospital were offered to perform an anal self-sampling for cytologic and virologic evaluation. A self-sampling kit was provided, and a tutorial video was shown. A subset of participants had a proctology appointment after they did the self-sampling, and thus had a clinical examination and an anal swab sampling performed by the proctologist, using the same sampling material.

resultsAnal self-sampling was offered to 103 patients, and 100 accepted. Sixty-three samples were interpretable, of which 36 (57%) were normal and 27 (43%) showed abnormal results. Virologic analysis was performed for 60 (95%) interpretable samples: 50/60 (83%) of them were positive for HPV. Among HPV-carrier patients, 42/50 (84%) were infected with at least one HR-HPV. Twenty patients had a proctologist consultation. All clinician-performed samples were interpretable and 14 (70%) self-samples were interpretable.

conclusionsThis study highlights the acceptable accuracy of self-sampling screening method among MSM living with HIV and try out its acceptability and feasibility as a secondary prevention device. Although it cannot replace a proctologist consultation for high risk patients, self-sampling should be studied further as one of the ways of screening for anal cancer among low-risk outpatients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory CareAnal CanalAnus NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Education as TopicSelf CareSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID33561135
PMCPMC7872249
OpenAlexW3129012942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.