Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561127›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Toward on-the-fly trajectory optimization for C-arm CBCT under strong kinematic constraints.

Sepideh Hatamikia, Ander Biguri, Gernot Kronreif, Michael Figl, Tom Russ, Joachim Kettenbach, Martin Buschmann, Wolfgang Birkfellner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extension of the open-source TIGRE toolbox for proton imaging.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023
    Article
  5. Development of a Solvability Map.Medical research archives · 2023
    Article
  6. Universal orbit design for metal artifact elimination.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sepideh HatamikiaAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0182-0954
Ander BiguriInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gernot KronreifAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Michael FiglCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tom RussComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim KettenbachInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Landesklinikum, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Martin BuschmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang BirkfellnerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology · ATHeidelberg University · DEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become a vital tool in interventional radiology. Usually, a circular source-detector trajectory is used to acquire a three-dimensional (3D) image. Kinematic constraints due to the patient size or additional medical equipment often cause collisions with the imager while performing a full circular rotation. In a previous study, we developed a framework to design collision-free, patient-specific trajectories for the cases in which circular CBCT is not feasible. Our proposed trajectories included enough information to appropriately reconstruct a particular volume of interest (VOI), but the constraints had to be defined before the intervention. As most collisions are unpredictable, performing an on-the-fly trajectory optimization is desirable. In this study, we propose a search strategy that explores a set of trajectories that cover the whole collision-free area and subsequently performs a search locally in the areas with the highest image quality. Selecting the best trajectories is performed using simulations on a prior diagnostic CT volume which serves as a digital phantom for simulations. In our simulations, the Feature SIMilarity Index (FSIM) is used as the objective function to evaluate the imaging quality provided by different trajectories. We investigated the performance of our methods using three different anatomical targets inside the Alderson-Rando phantom. We used FSIM and Universal Quality Image (UQI) to evaluate the final reconstruction results. Our experiments showed that our proposed trajectories could achieve a comparable image quality in the VOI compared to the standard C-arm circular CBCT. We achieved a relative deviation less than 10% for both FSIM and UQI metrics between the reconstructed images from the optimized trajectories and the standard C-arm CBCT for all three targets. The whole trajectory optimization took approximately three to four minutes.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID33561127
PMCPMC7872257
OpenAlexW3126496681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.