Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33561094›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

The Value of Early Tumor Size Response to Chemotherapy in Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Roelof van Ewijk, Bas Vaarwerk, Willemijn B Breunis, Reineke A Schoot, Simone A J Ter Horst, Rick R van Rijn, Johanna H van der Lee, Johannes H M Merks

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Rhabdomyosarcoma in Adults: Case Series and Literature Review.International journal of women's health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roelof van EwijkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0339-6031
Bas VaarwerkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1336-0112
Willemijn B BreunisDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reineke A SchootPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-981X
Simone A J Ter HorstPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-5826
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8876-6515
Johanna H van der LeePediatric Clinical Research Office, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes H M MerksPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emma Kinderziekenhuis · NLPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

SKOCA Foundation (Pediatric Oncology Center Amsterdam) -Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij 175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in childhood. Results of clinical trials, with three-year event-free and overall survival as primary outcomes, often take 7 to 10 years. Identification of an early surrogate biomarker, predictive for survival, is therefore crucial. We conducted a systematic review to define the prognostic value of early tumor size response in children with IRSG group III rhabdomyosarcoma. The search included MEDLINE/EMBASE from inception to 18 November 2020. In total, six studies were included, describing 2010 patients, and assessed by the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) instrument. Four studies found no prognostic value for tumor size response, whereas two studies reported a prognostic effect. In these two studies, the survival rate of patients with progressive disease was not separately analyzed from patients with stable disease, potentially explaining the difference in study outcome. In conclusion, our findings support that early progression of disease is associated with poorer survival, justifying adaptation of therapy. However, in patients with non-progressive disease, there is no evidence that the degree of response is a prognostic marker for survival. Because the vast majority of patients do not have progressive disease, early tumor size response should be reconsidered for assessment of treatment efficacy. Therefore, at present, early surrogate biomarkers for survival are still lacking.

Indexed as

biomarkerprognosisresponserhabdomyosarcomasarcoma

Identifiers

PMID33561094
PMCPMC7866196
OpenAlexW3129015402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.