Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33560996›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Perception of COVID-19 Physical Distancing Effectiveness and Contagiousness of Asymptomatic Individuals: Cross-sectional Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Adults in the United States.

Raylene Paludneviciene, Tracy Knight, Gideon Firl, Kaela Luttrell, Kota Takayama, Poorna Kushalnagar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health literacy of the Deaf community: a scoping review.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raylene PaludnevicieneDepartment of Psychology, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-361X
Tracy KnightDepartment of World Languages and Cultures, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0480-2652
Gideon FirlCenter for Deaf Health Equity, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9398-7435
Kaela LuttrellCenter for Deaf Health Equity, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3934-5423
Kota TakayamaDepartment of Social Work, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7767-018X
Poorna KushalnagarDepartment of Psychology, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8658-6932
Gallaudet University · USSam Houston State University · US

Funding

Quality of Life and Needs of Deaf/Hard of Hearing CaregiversR01DC014463 · NIDCD · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KUSHALNAGAR, POORNA · 2015 to 2020
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a rapid increase in the amount of information about the disease and SARS-CoV-2 on the internet. If the language used in video messages is not clear or understandable to deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) people with a high school degree or less, this can cause confusion and result in information gaps among DHH people during a health emergency.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between DHH people's perception of the effectiveness of physical distancing and contagiousness of an asymptomatic person.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional survey study on DHH people's perceptions about COVID-19 (N=475). Items pertaining to COVID-19 knowledge were administered to US deaf adults from April 17, 2020, to May 1, 2020, via a bilingual American Sign Language/English online survey platform.

resultsThe sample consisted of 475 DHH adults aged 18-88 years old, with 74% (n=352) identifying as White and 54% (n=256) as female. About 88% (n=418) of the sample felt they knew most things or a lot about physical distancing. This figure dropped to 72% (n=342) for the question about the effectiveness of physical distancing in reducing the spread of COVID-19 and 70% (n=333) for the question about the contagiousness of an infected person without symptoms. Education and a knowledge of the effectiveness of physical distancing significantly predicted knowledge about the contagiousness of an asymptomatic individual. Race, gender, and age did not emerge as significant predictors.

conclusionsThis results of this study point to the strong connection between education and coronavirus-related knowledge. Education-related disparities can be remedied by making information fully accessible and easily understood during emergencies and pandemics.

Indexed as

Physical DistancingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPerceptionPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSARS-CoV-2asymptomatic individualcoronavirusCOVID-19deafhard of hearingmisinformationperceptionphysical distancingsign languagesocial media

Identifiers

PMID33560996
PMCPMC7909306
OpenAlexW3126877514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.