Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33560494›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2021

Neural correlates of sex-related differences in attachment dimensions.

Daniela Altavilla, Chiara Ciacchella, Gaia Romana Pellicano, Marco Cecchini, Renata Tambelli, Navkiran Kalsi, Paola Aceto, Carlo Lai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela AltavillaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CiacchellaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Gaia Romana PellicanoDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Marco CecchiniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Renata TambelliDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Navkiran KalsiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Paola AcetoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Carlo LaiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy. carlo.lai@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-0375
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate sex-related differences in the electrophysiological response to socioemotional stimuli (positive, negative, and ambiguous) depicting couple interactions. The associations between anxiety and avoidance attachment dimensions (measured with the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire) and the strength of cortico-limbic circuit intensity was explored, recorded using a 256-Hydrocel Geodesic Sensor-Net. Event-related potentials (ERPs) and standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) data were analyzed for a total sample of 74 participants. Regression analyses showed that the women presented increased brain intensity compared with that in men, and the avoidance score was positively associated with brain intensity, particularly in response to negative socioemotional stimuli. The interaction sex per avoidance was a significant predictor of intensity in many brain areas, with women displaying significantly more pronounced positive associations between avoidance and brain intensity than men. In conclusion, the findings of the present study showed that women appeared to be more emotionally involved during the socioemotional task. Avoidance was positively associated with intensity of the cingulate and prefrontal regions, and these associations were more pronounced in women than in men. These findings suggested that avoidance seems to represent two different socioemotional strategies, in which women appear to activate an avoidant strategy to modulate increased emotional involvement in relationships, whereas men appear to adopt avoidance with a more intense emotional suppression.

Indexed as

EmotionsEvoked PotentialsAnxietyBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleAvoidant attachment dimensionERPNeural correlatesSex differencessLORETA

Identifiers

PMID33560494
PMCPMC7994245
OpenAlexW3126521214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.