Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33560390›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2021

Measurable residual disease in elderly acute myeloid leukemia: results from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA phase 3 clinical trial.

Catia Simoes, Bruno Paiva, David Martínez-Cuadrón, Juan-Miguel Bergua, Susana Vives, Lorenzo Algarra, Mar Tormo, Pilar Martinez, Josefina Serrano, Pilar Herrera and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Catia SimoesDepartment of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Bruno PaivaDepartment of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
David Martínez-CuadrónHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Juan-Miguel BerguaHospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain.
Susana VivesInstituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO), Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Lorenzo AlgarraHospital General de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Mar TormoHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pilar MartinezHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Josefina SerranoHospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain.
Pilar HerreraHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando RamosHospital Universitario de León, Léon, Spain.
Olga SalameroHospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
Esperanza LavillaHospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Cristina GilHospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Jose-Luis LopezFundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Maria-Belen VidrialesHospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Jorge LabradorHospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Jose-Francisco FalantesComplejo Hospitalario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain.
María-José SayasUniversity Hospital Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Rosa AyalaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Joaquin Martinez-LopezInstituto de Investigacion 12 de Octubre, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Sara VillarDepartment of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Maria-Jose CalasanzCentro de Investigación Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain.
Felipe ProsperDepartment of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jesús F San-MiguelDepartment of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Miguel Ángel SanzHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Pau MontesinosHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital de León · ESHospital General Universitario de Albacete · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital San Pedro de Alcántara · ESHospital Universitario de Burgos · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of measurable residual disease (MRD) in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is inconsistent between those treated with intensive vs hypomethylating drugs, and unknown after semi-intensive therapy. We investigated the role of MRD in refining complete remission (CR) and treatment duration in the phase 3 FLUGAZA clinical trial, which randomized 283 elderly AML patients to induction and consolidation with fludarabine plus cytarabine (FLUGA) vs 5-azacitidine. After consolidation, patients continued treatment if MRD was ≥0.01% or stopped if MRD was <0.01%, as assessed by multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC). On multivariate analysis including genetic risk and treatment arm, MRD status in patients achieving CR (N = 72) was the only independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR, 3.45; P = .002). Achieving undetectable MRD significantly improved RFS of patients with adverse genetics (HR, 0.32; P = .013). Longer overall survival was observed in patients with undetectable MRD after induction though not after consolidation. Although leukemic cells from most patients displayed phenotypic aberrancies vs their normal counterpart (N = 259 of 265), CD34 progenitors from cases with undetectable MRD by MFC carried extensive genetic abnormalities identified by whole-exome sequencing. Interestingly, the number of genetic alterations significantly increased from diagnosis to MRD stages in patients treated with FLUGA vs 5-azacitidine (2.2-fold vs 1.1-fold; P = .001). This study supports MRD assessment to refine CR after semi-intensive therapy or hypomethylating agents, but unveils that improved sensitivity is warranted to individualize treatment and prolong survival of elderly AML patients achieving undetectable MRD.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAgedCytarabineHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisRemission InductionCytarabine

Identifiers

PMID33560390
PMCPMC7876892
OpenAlexW3094967368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.