Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33560371›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2021

A serum-based DNA methylation assay provides accurate detection of glioma.

Thais S Sabedot, Tathiane M Malta, James Snyder, Kevin Nelson, Michael Wells, Ana C deCarvalho, Abir Mukherjee, Dhananjay A Chitale, Maritza S Mosella, Artem Sokolov and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent Developments in Blood Biomarkers in Neuro-oncology.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thais S SabedotDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Tathiane M MaltaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
James SnyderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Kevin NelsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Michael WellsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Ana C deCarvalhoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Abir MukherjeeDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Dhananjay A ChitaleDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Maritza S MosellaOmics Laboratory, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Artem SokolovLaboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8056-0504
Karam P AsmaroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-4863
Adam RobinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Mark L RosenblumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Tom MikkelsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jack RockDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Laila M PoissonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3409-6536
Ian LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Tobias WalbertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Steven KalkanisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Antonio IavaroneInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ana Valeria CastroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Houtan NoushmehrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4051-8114
Henry Ford Health System · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Molecular and clinical evaluation of the glioma patient experience to anticipate modern outcomes and guide patient careR01CA222146 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI POISSON, LAILA M · 2018 to 2023
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of somatic mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from liquid biopsy has emerged as a noninvasive tool to monitor the follow-up of cancer patients. However, the significance of cfDNA clinical utility remains uncertain in patients with brain tumors, primarily because of the limited sensitivity cfDNA has to detect real tumor-specific somatic mutations. This unresolved challenge has prevented accurate follow-up of glioma patients with noninvasive approaches.

methodsGenome-wide DNA methylation profiling of tumor tissue and serum cfDNA of glioma patients.

resultsHere, we developed a noninvasive approach to profile the DNA methylation status in the serum of patients with gliomas and identified a cfDNA-derived methylation signature that is associated with the presence of gliomas and related immune features. By testing the signature in an independent discovery and validation cohorts, we developed and verified a score metric (the "glioma-epigenetic liquid biopsy score" or GeLB) that optimally distinguished patients with or without glioma (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 97.78%). Furthermore, we found that changes in GeLB score reflected clinicopathological changes during surveillance (eg, progression, pseudoprogression, and response to standard or experimental treatment).

conclusionsOur results suggest that the GeLB score can be used as a complementary approach to diagnose and follow up patients with glioma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEpigenomicsHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumorcell-free DNAepigeneticsgliomapseudoprogressionserum

Identifiers

PMID33560371
PMCPMC8408843
OpenAlexW3128711569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.