ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
Frequency-specific network effective connectivity: ERP analysis of recognition memory process by directed connectivity estimators.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human memory retrieval is one of the brain's most important, and least understood cognitive mechanisms. Traditionally, research on this aspect of memory has focused on the contributions of particular brain regions to recognition responses, but the interaction between regions may be of even greater importance to a full understanding. In this study, we examined patterns of network connectivity during retrieval in a recognition memory task. We estimated connectivity between brain regions from electroencephalographic signals recorded from twenty healthy subjects. A multivariate autoregressive model (MVAR) was used to determine the Granger causality to estimate the effective connectivity in the time-frequency domain. We used GPDC and dDTF methods because they have almost resolved the previous volume conduction and bivariate problems faced by previous estimation methods. Results show enhanced global connectivity in the theta and gamma bands on target trials relative to lure trials. Connectivity within and between the brain's hemispheres may be related to correct rejection. The left frontal signature appears to have a crucial role in recollection. Theta- and gamma-specific connectivity patterns between temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex may disclose the retrieval mechanism. Old/new comparison resulted in different patterns of network connection. These results and other evidence emphasize the role of frequency-specific causal network interactions in the memory retrieval process. Graphical abstract a Schematic of processing workflow which is consists of pre-processing, sliding-window AMVAR modeling, connectivity estimation, and validation and group network analysis. b Co-registration between Geodesic Sensor Net. and 10-20 system, the arrows mention eight regions of interest (Left, Anterior, Inferior (LAI) and Right, Anterior, Inferior (RAI) and Left, Anterior, Superior (LAS) and Right, Anterior, Superior (RAS) and Left, Posterior, Inferior (LPI) and Right, Posterior, Inferior (RPI) and Left, Posterior, Superior (LPS) and Right, Posterior, Superior (RPS)).
Indexed as
Identifiers
33559863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.