Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559821›Full record

Observational studyClinical drug investigation2021

Observational Study of Chlorpromazine in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.

Nicolas Hoertel, Marina Sánchez-Rico, Raphaël Vernet, Anne-Sophie Jannot, Antoine Neuraz, Carlos Blanco, Cédric Lemogne, Guillaume Airagnes, Nicolas Paris, Christel Daniel and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicolas HoertelDMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, 4 parvis Corentin Celton, 92130, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Marina Sánchez-RicoDMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, 4 parvis Corentin Celton, 92130, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France. marinals@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-8641
Raphaël VernetMedical Informatics, Biostatistics and Public Health Department, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie JannotFaculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Antoine NeurazINSERM, UMR_S 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Carlos BlancoNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cédric LemogneDMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, 4 parvis Corentin Celton, 92130, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Guillaume AiragnesDMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, 4 parvis Corentin Celton, 92130, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Nicolas ParisAP-HP. Département Web Innovation Données (DSI-WIND), Paris, France.
Christel DanielAP-HP. Département Web Innovation Données (DSI-WIND), Paris, France.
Alexandre GramfortUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Guillaume LemaitreUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Mélodie BernauxAP-HP, Direction de la stratégie et de la transformation, Paris, France.
Ali BellamineUnité de Recherche clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Nathanaël BeekerUnité de Recherche clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Frédéric LimosinDMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, 4 parvis Corentin Celton, 92130, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
AP-HP/Universities/INSERM COVID-19 Research Collaboration and AP-HP COVID CDR Initiative
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChlorpromazine has been suggested as being potentially useful in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the grounds of its potential antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the association between chlorpromazine use and mortality among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

methodsWe conducted an observational, multicenter, retrospective study at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Greater Paris University hospitals. Study baseline was defined as the date of first prescription of chlorpromazine during hospitalization for COVID-19. The primary endpoint was death. Among patients who had not been hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs), we compared this endpoint between those who received chlorpromazine and those who did not, in time-to-event analyses adjusted for patient characteristics, clinical markers of disease severity, and other psychotropic medications. The primary analysis used a Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsOf the 14,340 adult inpatients hospitalized outside ICUs for COVID-19, 55 patients (0.4%) received chlorpromazine. Over a mean follow-up of 14.3 days (standard deviation [SD] 18.2), death occurred in 13 patients (23.6%) who received chlorpromazine and 1289 patients (9.0%) who did not. In the primary analysis, there was no significant association between chlorpromazine use and mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-5.40; p = 0.163). Sensitivity analyses included a Cox regression in a 1:5 ratio matched analytic sample that showed a similar result (HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.91-3.06; p = 0.100) and a multivariable Cox regression that indicated a significant positive association (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.31-7.34; p = 0.010).

conclusionOur results suggest that chlorpromazine prescribed at a mean daily dose of 70.8 mg (SD 65.3) was not associated with reduced mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChlorpromazineFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexYoung AdultChlorpromazine

Identifiers

PMID33559821
PMCPMC7871023
OpenAlexW3129167511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.