Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559726›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2021

Intra-abdominal lymphatic malformation management in light of the updated International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies classification.

Heba Elbaaly, Nelson Piché, Françoise Rypens, Niina Kleiber, Chantale Lapierre, Josée Dubois

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intralesional bleomycin injection treatment of intra-abdominal lymphangiomas presenting with acute abdomen in children.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heba ElbaalyMedical Imaging Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Nelson PichéSurgery Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Françoise RypensMedical Imaging Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Niina KleiberPediatrics Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Chantale LapierreMedical Imaging Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Josée DuboisMedical Imaging Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. josee.dubois.hsj@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classification distinguishes between common lymphatic malformations and complex lymphatic anomalies. These entities have overlapping features but differing responses to treatment. Surgery has been the mainstream treatment in intra-abdominal lymphatic malformation, with variable reported success in the literature.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to review the outcome of different treatments for intra-abdominal lymphatic malformations in children. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all intra-abdominal lymphatic malformations from 1999 to 2019 in children treated by the surgical team or followed in the vascular anomalies clinic of our institution. Children were classified into one of three groups: group A, isolated intra-abdominal lymphatic malformation; group B, common lymphatic malformation in continuity with other regions; or group C, intra-abdominal involvement as part of a complex lymphatic anomaly or associated syndrome.

resultsFifty intra-abdominal lymphatic malformations were diagnosed; five of these were excluded. In group A (n=28), the treatment was surgical resection (n=26) or sclerosing treatment (n=1), with one case of spontaneous regression; no recurrence was observed in 25 patients. In group B (n=7), three patients had partial resection and all had recurrence; four had sclerotherapy alone with good response. In group C (n=10), therapeutic options included surgery, sclerosing treatment and pharmacotherapy, with variable outcomes.

conclusionThe management of intra-abdominal malformations requires a team approach. Sclerotherapy is successful in treating macrocystic lymphatic malformation. Surgery is successful in treating isolated intra-abdominal common lymphatic malformation, albeit at times at the cost of intestinal resection, which could be avoided by combining surgery with preoperative sclerotherapy. With surgery there is often limited resectability, and therefore recurrence in intra-abdominal lymphatic malformations that are part of complex lymphatic anomalies associated with syndromes, or in common lymphatic malformations in continuity with other regions. Sclerotherapy is an effective modality in these instances along with pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

Lymphatic AbnormalitiesVascular MalformationsChildHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesSclerotherapyTreatment OutcomeAbdomenChildrenInterventional radiologyLymphatic malformationSclerotherapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID33559726
OpenAlexW3126396702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.