Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559707›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2021

Respiratory microbiome in mechanically ventilated patients: a narrative review.

Mélanie Fromentin, Jean-Damien Ricard, Damien Roux

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07490028 (Study of the Variation in Viscoelastic Properties of Pulmonary Mucus in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation With or Without NIV), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07490028 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Variation in Viscoelastic Properties of Pulmonary Mucus in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation With or Without NIV

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal Aix-PertuisRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsVentilated Patient in Intensive Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Respiratory Microbiome of Carbapenem-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Associations Between Candida andMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Beyond the organ: lung microbiome shapes transplant indications and outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mélanie FromentinAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, 75014, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-5092
Jean-Damien RicardMédecine Intensive Réanimation, DMU ESPRIT, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700, Colombes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-2299
Damien RouxMédecine Intensive Réanimation, DMU ESPRIT, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700, Colombes, France. damien.roux@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-6416
Inserm · FR

Funding

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Basic Science AwardEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine Established Investigator awardSociété de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française Young investigator awardSociété de Réanimation de Langue Française MSD/SRLF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The respiratory microbiome has been less explored than the gut microbiome. Despite the speculated importance of dysbiosis of the microbiome in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), only few studies have been performed in invasively ventilated ICU patients. And only the results of small cohorts have been published. An overlap exists between bacterial populations observed in the lower respiratory tract and the oropharyngeal tract. The bacterial microbiota is characterized by relatively abundant bacteria difficult to cultivate by standard methods. Under mechanical ventilation, a dysbiosis occurs with a drop overtime in diversity. During VAP development, lung dysbiosis is characterized by a shift towards a dominant bacterial pathogen (mostly Proteobacteria) whereas enrichment of gut-associated bacteria mainly Enterobacteriaceae is the specific feature discriminating ARDS patients. However, the role of this dysbiosis in VAP and ARDS pathogenesis is not yet fully understood. A more in-depth analysis of the interplay between bacteria, virus and fungi and a better understanding of the host-microbiome interaction could provide a more comprehensive view of the role of the microbiome in VAP and ARDS pathogenesis. Priority should be given to validate a consensual and robust methodology for respiratory microbiome research and to conduct longitudinal studies. A deeper understanding of microbial interplay should be a valuable guide for care of ARDS and VAP preventive/therapeutic strategies. We present a review on the current knowledge and expose perspectives and potential clinical applications of respiratory microbiome research in mechanically ventilated patients.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedRespiratory Distress SyndromeDysbiosisHumansRespiration, Artificial16S rRNA geneAcute respiratory distress syndromeDysbiosisHigh-throughput sequencingLung microbiomeMechanical ventilationMetagenomicsVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID33559707
PMCPMC7871139
OpenAlexW3127825824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.