Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559332›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2021

Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials.

Kevin Woo, Caroline Dowsett, Ben Costa, Stephen Ebohon, Emma J Woodmansey, Matthew Malone

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kevin WooSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline DowsettEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ben CostaSmith & Nephew Clinical and Medical Affairs, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Stephen EbohonSmith & Nephew Clinical and Medical Affairs, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Emma J WoodmanseySmith & Nephew Clinical and Medical Affairs, Kingston upon Hull, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-2240
Matthew MaloneSouth West Sydney Limb Preservation and Wound Research, Sydney, Australia.
Hull York Medical School · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen's University · CAThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects (I

Indexed as

Diabetic FootVaricose UlcerHumansIodophorsWound Healingcadexomer iodineIodophorscadexomer iodinedesloughingexudateinfectionwound healing

Identifiers

PMID33559332
PMCPMC8450789
OpenAlexW3129046759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.