ArticleStatistics in medicine2021
Integrative sparse partial least squares.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-activity modeling and hybrid machine learning-based prediction of bioactivity in pyrazole derivatives for drug discovery applications.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2026Article
- The potential role of machine learning and deep learning in differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and FTD using imaging biomarkers: A review.The neuroradiology journal · 2025Review
- Integrative analysis of high-dimensional quantile regression with contrasted penalization.Journal of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Prior information-assisted integrative analysis of multiple datasets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Partial least squares, as a dimension reduction technique, has become increasingly important for its ability to deal with problems with a large number of variables. Since noisy variables may weaken estimation performance, the sparse partial least squares (SPLS) technique has been proposed to identify important variables and generate more interpretable results. However, the small sample size of a single dataset limits the performance of conventional methods. An effective solution comes from gathering information from multiple comparable studies. Integrative analysis has essential importance in multidatasets analysis. The main idea is to improve performance by assembling raw data from multiple independent datasets and analyzing them jointly. In this article, we develop an integrative SPLS (iSPLS) method using penalization based on the SPLS technique. The proposed approach consists of two penalties. The first penalty conducts variable selection under the context of integrative analysis. The second penalty, a contrasted penalty, is imposed to encourage the similarity of estimates across datasets and generate more sensible and accurate results. Computational algorithms are developed. Simulation experiments are conducted to compare iSPLS with alternative approaches. The practical utility of iSPLS is shown in the analysis of two TCGA gene expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.