Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559166›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2021

Pathways to Modern Family Planning: A Longitudinal Study on Social Influence among Men and Women in Benin.

Susan Igras, Sarah Burgess, Heather Chantelois-Kashal, Mariam Diakité, Monica Giuffrida, Rebecka Lundgren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan IgrasSusan Igras, Mariam Diakité, Institute for Reproductive Health, Center for Child and Human Development, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Sarah BurgessSarah Burgess, Camber Collective, Seattle, WA, USA.
Heather Chantelois-KashalHeather Chantelois-Kashal, Independent Consultant.
Mariam DiakitéSusan Igras, Mariam Diakité, Institute for Reproductive Health, Center for Child and Human Development, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Monica GiuffridaMonica Giuffrida, Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rebecka LundgrenRebecka Lundgren, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Camber Collective (United States) · USGeorgetown University · USInstitute for Reproductive Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USOldham Council · GBUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improvements in family planning (FP) knowledge and services in West Africa, unmet need for FP continues to grow. Many programs apply a demographically and biologically driven definition of unmet need, overlooking the complex social environment in which fertility and FP decisions are made. This longitudinal, qualitative cohort study captures the changing nature of FP need, attitudes and behaviors, taking into account life context to inform understanding of the complex behavior change process. Purposively sampled, 25 women and 25 men participated in three rounds of in-depth interviews over 18 months. Analyses used a social network influence lens. Findings suggest alignment of six foundational building blocks operating at individual, couple, services, and social levels is essential to meet FP need. If one block is weak, a person may not achieve met need. Women and men commonly follow five pathways as they seek to fulfill their FP need. Some pathways achieve met need (determined users, quick converters), some do not (side effect avoiders), and some do not lead to consistent FP outcomes (male-priority decision makers, gender-egalitarian decision makers). Findings clarify the role of social determinants of FP and offer insight into program approaches informed by user typologies and return on program investments.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesBeninCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMale

Identifiers

PMID33559166
PMCPMC8048892
OpenAlexW3128232588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.