Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559101›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2021

Next-Generation Androgen Receptor-Signaling Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Older Patients.

Zizhen Feng, Julie N Graff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Androgen Signaling in Prostate Cancer: When a Friend Turns Foe.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zizhen FengKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Julie N GraffKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. graffj@ohsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is common, particularly in older patients, as the risk of getting prostate cancer increases with age. Cancer therapy brings unique challenges in older patients, as this population is vulnerable to many side effects and drug interactions, and they have varying degrees of frailty, which may limit the use of these therapies. The US FDA has recently approved several novel next-generation hormonal therapies for patients with various stages of prostate cancer, giving patients more treatment options. These therapies (e.g., apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide, and abiraterone) have unique side effects that the practitioner must consider when evaluating therapeutic treatments in any patient, and these side effects also affect older patients differently. Here, we review the mechanism of action and metabolism of the next-generation hormonal therapies; report efficacy and safety data from trials of these agents in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; and discuss the intricacies of treating older men with prostate cancer. Key takeaways include the fact that enzalutamide and apalutamide may increase the risk of falls and fractures in older patients. Abiraterone requires the concurrent use of low-dose glucocorticoids, which can lead to side effects in older patients. Lastly, drug-drug interactions should be considered in older patients using multiple medications.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantReceptors, AndrogenAgedAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMalePhenylthiohydantoinAndrogen AntagonistsPhenylthiohydantoinReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.