Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33559067›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2021

Impact of Pre-visit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Physician Communication and Patient Activation: a Randomized Trial.

Jeana M Holt, Rachel Cusatis, Aaron Winn, Onur Asan, Charles Spanbauer, Joni S Williams, Kathryn E Flynn, Melek Somai, AkkeNeel Talsma, Purushottam Laud and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03766841 (Avoiding Health Disparities When Collecting Patient Contextual Data for Clinical Care and Pragmatic Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03766841 nacompletednot on this map

Avoiding Health Disparities When Collecting Patient Contextual Data for Clinical Care and Pragmatic Research

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2019 to 2019Enrolled301ConditionsCommunicationArmsFacilitated Enrollment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. User Requirements for Comanaged Digital Health and Care: Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The Potential of Pre-visit Patient Information.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. In Reply Letter to Editor.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeana M HoltUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI, USA. jmholt@uwm.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3392-0164
Rachel CusatisDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Aaron WinnSchool of Pharmacy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Onur AsanStevens Institute of Technology, School of Systems & Enterprises, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Charles SpanbauerDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Joni S WilliamsDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Kathryn E FlynnDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Melek SomaiDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
AkkeNeel TalsmaUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Purushottam LaudDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Gregory MakoulPatientWisdom, Inc. and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Bradley H CrottyDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
HRSA HHS T32HP10030NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient contextual data (PCD) are often missing from electronic health records, limiting the opportunity to incorporate preferences and life circumstances into care. Engaging patients through tools that collect and summarize such data may improve communication and patient activation. However, differential tool adoption by race might widen health care disparities.

objectiveDetermine if a digital tool designed to collect and present PCD improves communication and patient activation; secondarily, evaluate if use impacts outcomes by race. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA pragmatic, two-armed, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted during 2019 in a primary care setting.

interventionThe PCD tool (PatientWisdom) invited patients to identify preferences, values, goals, and barriers to care. Patients were randomized to a standard pre-visit email or facilitated enrollment with dedicated outreach to encourage use of the tool. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were post-visit patient communication and patient activation measured by the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) and Patient Activation Measure (PAM), respectively. Outcomes were evaluated using treatment-on-the-treated (TOT) and intention-to-treat (ITT) principles. KEY

resultsA total of 301 patients were enrolled. Facilitated enrollment resulted in a five-fold increase in uptake of the PCD tool. TOT analysis indicated that the PCD tool was associated with notable increases in specific CAT items rated as excellent: "treated me with respect" (+ 13 percentage points; p = 0.04), "showed interest in my ideas" (+ 14 percentage points; p = 0.03), "showed care and concern" (+ 16 percentage points; p = 0.02), and "spent about the right amount of time with me" (+ 11 percentage points; p = 0.05). There were no significant pre/post-visit differences in PAM scores between arms (- 4.41 percentage points; p = 0.58). ITT results were similar. We saw no evidence of the treatment effect varying by race in ITT or TOT analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The inclusion of PCD enhanced essential aspects of patient-provider communication but did not affect patient activation. Outcomes did not differ by race.

trial registrationClincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03766841.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPhysiciansCommunicationData CollectionHumansPhysician-Patient Relationshealth care disparitieshealth information technologypatient contextual datapatient participationpatient-provider communicationprimary health carerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33559067
PMCPMC8606508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.