ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021
Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of digital tools to promote hospital quality and safety on adverse events after discharge.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Trial
- Nurse practitioner led implementation of huddles for staff in long term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC geriatrics · 2023Trial
- Exploring Healthcare Engagement Among Young Mothers and Their Children in Southern New Jersey: A Descriptive Survey Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Community living center-mental health integration in the Veterans Health Administration: Evaluation of practice patterns.Psychological services · 2026Article
- Reducing surgical site infections in paediatric cardiac surgery in a resource-constrained setting: a quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Partnering an implementation strategy with a multi-modal education to improve delirium practices.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Physician Variation in Early Sepsis Management.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Feasibility and implementation of a daily safety brief at a children's hospital-in-a-hospital.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Workplace loneliness and the communication climate of healthcare workers: the moderating role of perceived social competence.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Proactive huddles to reduce missed nursing care; the mediating roles of personal situational awareness and rational coordination: A cluster randomized pre post intervention study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Empowering Culture Change and Safety on the Journey to Zero Harm With Huddle Cards.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- Improving Documentation and Follow-Up of Elevated Blood Pressure in a Family Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project.Cureus · 2025Article
- Development and implementation of paging and escalation guidelines to improve interprofessional communication on surgical units.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Nurses' Descriptions of Workplace Efforts to Improve Professional Well-being: An Analysis.The Journal of nursing administration · 2025Article
- Resident- and family-led huddles for collaborative care planning in long-term care: a feasibility study.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Article
- Streamlining Communication: "Resident Huddle" on General Medicine Wards at a Veterans Affairs Hospital.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Article
- The Role of High Reliability Organization Foundational Practices in Building a Culture of Safety.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024Article
- A qualitative co-design-based approach to identify sources of workplace-related distress and develop well-being strategies for cardiovascular nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- An evaluation of outpatient satisfaction based on the national standard questionnaire: a satisfaction survey conducted in a tertiary hospital in Shenyang, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrief, stand-up meetings known as huddles may improve clinical care, but knowledge about huddle implementation and effectiveness at the frontlines is fragmented and setting specific. This work provides a comprehensive overview of huddles used in diverse health care settings, examines the empirical support for huddle effectiveness, and identifies knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research.
methodsA scoping review was completed by searching the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and OvidSP for studies published in English from inception to May 31, 2019. Eligible studies described huddles that (1) took place in a clinical or medical setting providing health care patient services, (2) included frontline staff members, (3) were used to improve care quality, and (4) were studied empirically. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts; seven reviewers independently abstracted data from full texts.
resultsOf 2,185 identified studies, 158 met inclusion criteria. The majority (67.7%) of studies described huddles used to improve team communication, collaboration, and/or coordination. Huddles positively impacted team process outcomes in 67.7% of studies, including improvements in efficiency, process-based functioning, and communication across clinical roles (64.4%); situational awareness and staff perceptions of safety and safety climate (44.6%); and staff satisfaction and engagement (29.7%). Almost half of studies (44.3%) reported huddles positively impacting clinical care outcomes such as patients receiving timely and/or evidence-based assessments and care (31.4%); decreased medical errors and adverse drug events (24.3%); and decreased rates of other negative outcomes (20.0%). DISCUSSION: Huddles involving frontline staff are an increasingly prevalent practice across diverse health care settings. Huddles are generally interdisciplinary and aimed at improving team communication, collaboration, and/or coordination. Data from the scoping review point to the effectiveness of huddles at improving work and team process outcomes and indicate the positive impact of huddles can extend beyond processes to include improvements in clinical outcomes. STUDY REGISTRATION: This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework on 18 January 2019 ( https://osf.io/bdj2x/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.