Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558991›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Standard radiographic assessments of distal radius fractures miss involvement of the distal radioulnar joint: a diagnostic study.

Laura A Hruby, Thomas Haider, Roberta Laggner, Claudia Gahleitner, Jochen Erhart, Walter Stoik, Stefan Hajdu, Gerhild Thalhammer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A HrubyDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas HaiderDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Roberta LaggnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia GahleitnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jochen ErhartDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital of the St. John of God Brothers Eisenstadt, Johannes von Gott-Platz 1, 7000, Eisenstadt, Austria.
Walter StoikDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan HajduDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhild ThalhammerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria. gerhild.thalhammer@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-0865
Medical University of Vienna · ATHospital of the Brothers of St. John of God · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDistal radius fractures account for one-fifth of all fractures in the emergency department. Their classification based on standard radiographs is common practice although low inter-observer reliabilities and superiority of computer tomography (CT) scanning in evaluation of joint congruency have been reported. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 96 displaced distal radius fractures scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation using standard radiographic assessment. The radiographs were classified with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA), Fernandez and Frykman classifications by three observers and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated. Additional CT scanning was performed in all cases and the following parameters were assessed: radiocarpal joint involvement, fracture extent into the radial sigmoid notch, i.e. the distal radio-ulnar joint, comminution of the metaphysis, and concomitant ulnar styloid fracture. The CT scans were used as a reference standard to determine sensitivity and accuracy of standard radiographic assessment in evaluation of distal radius fractures.

resultsThe inter-rater agreement for the AO classification was 35.4%, 68.8% for the Fernandez and 38.5% for the Frykman classification. Fracture extension into the radiocarpal joint was present in 81 cases (84.4%). Sigmoid notch involvement was found in 81 fractures (84.4%). Involvement of both joints was present in 72 cases (75%). The sensitivity of standard radiographs regarding radiocarpal joint involvement was 93.8%. Considering involvement of the distal radio-ulnar joint the false-negative rate using standard radiographs was 61.7% and the test's accuracy for sigmoid notch involvement was 45.8%.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that involvement of the sigmoid notch is frequently missed in standard radiographs. The presented data support the frequent use of CT imaging to allow the holistic illustration of a fracture's complexion and to ensure optimal pre-operative planning.

Indexed as

Radius FracturesUlna FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesWrist JointDistal radioulnar jointDistal radius fractureFracture classification systemInterobserver reliability

Identifiers

PMID33558991
PMCPMC9110479
OpenAlexW3127422388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.