Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558981›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Accuracy of identifying hospital acquired venous thromboembolism by administrative coding: implications for big data and machine learning research.

Tiffany Pellathy, Melissa Saul, Gilles Clermont, Artur W Dubrawski, Michael R Pinsky, Marilyn Hravnak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. A scoping review of the methodological approaches used in retrospective chart reviews to validate adverse event rates in administrative data.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Clinician perspectives.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiffany PellathyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, 336 Victoria Hall; 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. Tdp20@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3643-5308
Melissa SaulUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Gilles ClermontUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Artur W DubrawskiSchool of Computer Science, Auton Lab, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Michael R PinskyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Marilyn HravnakUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, 336 Victoria Hall; 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

Predicting Patient Instability Noninvasively for Nursing Care-Two (PPINNC-2)R01NR013912 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AL-ZAITI, SALAH S, CLERMONT, GILLES · 2012 to 2025
$7.0M
Machine Learning to Determine Dynamically Evolving New-Onset Venous Thromboembolic (VTE) Event Risk in Hospitalized PatientsF31NR018102 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PELLATHY, TIFFANY PURCELL · 2018 to 2020
$107k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR018102NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Big data analytics research using heterogeneous electronic health record (EHR) data requires accurate identification of disease phenotype cases and controls. Overreliance on ground truth determination based on administrative data can lead to biased and inaccurate findings. Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) is challenging to identify due to its temporal evolution and variable EHR documentation. To establish ground truth for machine learning modeling, we compared accuracy of HA-VTE diagnoses made by administrative coding to manual review of gold standard diagnostic test results. We performed retrospective analysis of EHR data on 3680 adult stepdown unit patients identifying HA-VTE. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM) codes for VTE were identified. 4544 radiology reports associated with VTE diagnostic tests were screened using terminology extraction and then manually reviewed by a clinical expert to confirm diagnosis. Of 415 cases with ICD-9-CM codes for VTE, 219 were identified with acute onset type codes. Test report review identified 158 new-onset HA-VTE cases. Only 40% of ICD-9-CM coded cases (n = 87) were confirmed by a positive diagnostic test report, leaving the majority of administratively coded cases unsubstantiated by confirmatory diagnostic test. Additionally, 45% of diagnostic test confirmed HA-VTE cases lacked corresponding ICD codes. ICD-9-CM coding missed diagnostic test-confirmed HA-VTE cases and inaccurately assigned cases without confirmed VTE, suggesting dependence on administrative coding leads to inaccurate HA-VTE phenotyping. Alternative methods to develop more sensitive and specific VTE phenotype solutions portable across EHR vendor data are needed to support case-finding in big-data analytics.

Indexed as

Venous ThromboembolismBig DataHospitalsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesAdministrative codingBig data analyticsElectronic health record dataMachine learningPhenotypingVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID33558981
PMCPMC8349368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.