Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558891›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2021

Short-term safety of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local resection for patients with high-risk submucosal invasive rectal cancer: a single-arm, multicenter phase II trial.

Masaaki Noguchi, Kohei Shitara, Akihito Kawazoe, Daisuke Yamamoto, Yasumasa Takii, Yutaka Saito, Toshihiko Sato, Takahiro Horimatsu, Hideki Ishikawa, Yoshinori Ito and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Masaaki NoguchiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei ShitaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Akihito KawazoeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Daisuke YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Ishikawa, Japan.
Yasumasa TakiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Niigata Cancer Centre Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiko SatoDepartment of Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Takahiro HorimatsuDepartment of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hideki IshikawaDepartment of Molecular-Targeting Cancer Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshinori ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroaki IkematsuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPIshikawa Prefectural Central Hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPShowa University · JPYamagata Prefectural Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery is recommended for patients with high-risk submucosal invasive rectal cancer (SM-RC) after local resection but affects the quality of life due to stoma placement or impaired anal function; therefore, alternative treatment approaches are needed to prevent local metastasis. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term safety of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine in patients with high-risk submucosal invasive rectal cancer after local resection.

methodsThis single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial included patients undergoing local resection for high-risk submucosal invasive rectal cancer within 12 weeks prior to enrollment. High-risk submucosal invasive rectal cancer was defined as the presence of at least one of the following factors: poor differentiation of adenocarcinoma, submucosal invasion depth > 1 mm, presence of lymphovascular invasion and grade-2 or -3 tumour budding. Protocol treatment comprised 45.0 Gy radiotherapy with conventional fractionation and 1650 mg/m2 capecitabine given twice daily until radiotherapy completion. The primary endpoint was treatment completion rate with an expected rate of 95% and a threshold of 80%.

resultsTwenty-nine patients from six institutions were enrolled between May 2015 and February 2018. One patient was ineligible. Twenty-three patients completed treatment, with a completion rate of 82% (80% confidence interval, 69-91%); the remaining five patients completed treatment with protocol deviation. The median relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 100% (range, 58-100%). Common adverse events included radiation dermatitis (54%), anal pain (39%) and anal mucositis (29%). No grade-3 or higher adverse events were reported.

conclusionsAdjuvant chemoradiotherapy using capecitabine demonstrated acceptable short-term safety profiles in patients with high-risk submucosal invasive rectal cancer after local resection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingQuality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsYoung Adultadjuvant chemoradiotherapycapecitabinelocal resectionrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33558891
PMCPMC8086053
OpenAlexW3128803645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.