Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558873›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Global Network Organization of the Fetal Functional Connectome.

Josepheen De Asis-Cruz, Nicole Andersen, Kushal Kapse, Dhineshvikram Khrisnamurthy, Jessica Quistorff, Catherine Lopez, Gilbert Vezina, Catherine Limperopoulos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Fetal Pain Perception:Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Towards a neuroethological approach to consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Advances in Fetal Brain Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josepheen De Asis-CruzDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Nicole AndersenDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Kushal KapseDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Dhineshvikram KhrisnamurthyDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Jessica QuistorffDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Catherine LopezDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Gilbert VezinaDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.
Catherine LimperopoulosDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington DC 20010.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-0069
Children's National · US

Funding

Antecedents of Impaired Brain Development in Fetuses with Heart DiseaseR01HL116585 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIMPEROPOULOS, CATHERINE · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
Canadian Institute of Health Research MOP-81116NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in brain imaging have enabled non-invasive in vivo assessment of the fetal brain. Characterizing brain development in healthy fetuses provides baseline measures for identifying deviations in brain function in high-risk clinical groups. We examined 110 resting state MRI data sets from fetuses at 19 to 40 weeks' gestation. Using graph-theoretic techniques, we characterized global organizational features of the fetal functional connectome and their prenatal trajectories. Topological features related to network integration (i.e., global efficiency) and segregation (i.e., clustering) were assessed. Fetal networks exhibited small-world topology, showing high clustering and short average path length relative to reference networks. Likewise, fetal networks' quantitative small world indices met criteria for small-worldness (σ > 1, ω = [-0.5 0.5]). Along with this, fetal networks demonstrated global and local efficiency, economy, and modularity. A right-tailed degree distribution, suggesting the presence of central areas that are more highly connected to other regions, was also observed. Metrics, however, were not static during gestation; measures associated with segregation-local efficiency and modularity-decreased with advancing gestational age. Altogether, these suggest that the neural circuitry underpinning the brain's ability to segregate and integrate information exists as early as the late 2nd trimester of pregnancy and reorganizes during the prenatal period. Significance statement. Mounting evidence for the fetal origins of some neurodevelopmental disorders underscores the importance of identifying features of healthy fetal brain functional development. Alterations in prenatal brain connectomics may serve as early markers for identifying fetal-onset neurodevelopmental disorders, which in turn provide improved surveillance of at-risk fetuses and support the initiation of early interventions.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetPregnancyProspective Studiesfetal brain developmentfetal connectomeglobal network organizationgraph theoryresting state MRI

Identifiers

PMID33558873
PMCPMC8107792
OpenAlexW3126661780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.