Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558801›Full record

ReviewEnvironment, development and sustainability2021

Positive environmental effects of the coronavirus 2020 episode: a review.

Milad Mousazadeh, Biswaranjan Paital, Zohreh Naghdali, Zohreh Mortezania, Marjan Hashemi, Elnaz Karamati Niaragh, Mohammad Aghababaei, Melika Ghorbankhani, Eric Lichtfouse, Mika Sillanpää and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environment, development and sustainability, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 environmental and operational impact for public transport in Kuwait.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The role of remote sensing during a global disaster: COVID-19 pandemic as case study.Remote sensing applications : society and environment · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A mini-review: positive impact of COVID-19 on Arial health and ecology.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Milad Mousazadeh *Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-3915
Biswaranjan Paital *Redox Regulation Laboratory, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Bhubaneswar, 751003 Odisha India.
Zohreh NaghdaliStudent Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Zohreh MortezaniaShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan HashemiEnvironmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elnaz Karamati NiaraghCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Hafez Ave., 15875-4413 Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AghababaeiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163 USA.
Melika GhorbankhaniMSc in Occupational Safety, Health and Wellbeing at Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Eric LichtfouseAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Coll France, CEREGE, 13100 Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8535-8073
Mika SillanpääInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000 Vietnam.
Khalid S HashimDepartment of Civil Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Mohammad Mahdi EmamjomehSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 has made a global catastrophic situation that caused 1,039,406 deaths out of 35,347,404 infections, and it will also cause significant socio-economic losses with poverty increasing from 17.1 to 25.9%. Although the spreading rate of COVID-19 is very high on October 6, 2020, the death rate is still less than 2.94%. Nonetheless, this review article shows that the lockdown has induced numerous positive impacts on the environment and on energy consumption. For instance, the lockdown has decreased the electricity demand by 30% in Italy, India, Germany, and the USA, and by 12-20% in France, Germany, Spain, India, and the UK. Additionally, the expenditure of the fuel supply has been decreased by 4% in 2020 as compared to the previous years (2012-2019). In particular, The global demand for coal fuel has been reduced by 8% in March and April 2020 as compared to the same time in 2019. In terms of harmful emissions, the lockdowns reduced the emissions of nitrous oxides by 20-30% in China, Italy, France, Spain, and by 77.3% in São Paulo, Brazil. Similarly, the particulate matter level has been reduced from 5-15% in Western Europe, to 200% in New Delhi, India, which in turn has enhanced the air quality in a never-seen manner in recent times. In some places, such as New York, USA, CO

Indexed as

Air pollutionCOVID-19 benefitsEnvironmental regenerationRenewable energySurface waterTraffic congestion

Identifiers

PMID33558801
PMCPMC7859094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.