Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558752›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2021

Unlocking the potential of antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy.

Joshua Z Drago, Shanu Modi, Sarat Chandarlapaty

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 641 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
641citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
65.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

641 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,025 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. [Clinical Progress and Prospects of Antibody-drug Conjugates in Advanced NSCLC].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  8. Patritumab deruxtecan in HRNature medicine · 2025
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  12. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic value and diagnostic performance of nectin-4-targeted [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

581 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua Z DragoDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-1172
Shanu ModiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. modis@mskcc.org.
Sarat ChandarlapatyDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. chandars@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-8053
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
MSK Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA184746 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Omar Abdel-Wahab, Simon N. Powell · 2015 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA184746NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nine different antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are currently approved as cancer treatments, with dozens more in preclinical and clinical development. The primary goal of ADCs is to improve the therapeutic index of antineoplastic agents by restricting their systemic delivery to cells that express the target antigen of interest. Advances in synthetic biochemistry have ushered in a new generation of ADCs, which promise to improve upon the tissue specificity and cytotoxicity of their predecessors. Many of these drugs have impressive activity against treatment-refractory cancers, although hurdles impeding their broader use remain, including systemic toxicity, inadequate biomarkers for patient selection, acquired resistance and unknown benefit in combination with other cancer therapies. Emerging evidence indicates that the efficacy of a given ADC depends on the intricacies of how the antibody, linker and payload components interact with the tumour and its microenvironment, all of which have important clinical implications. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the design, mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of ADCs as well as the apparent limitations of this treatment class. We then propose a path forward by highlighting several hypotheses and novel strategies to maximize the potential benefit that ADCs can provide to patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImmunoconjugatesNeoplasmsPatient SelectionAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID33558752
PMCPMC8287784
OpenAlexW3128485166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.